Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37481552›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2023

Circulating NPTX2 methylation as a non-invasive biomarker for prognosis and monitoring of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

María Victoria García-Ortiz, Pablo Cano-Ramírez, Marta Toledano-Fonseca, María Teresa Cano, Elizabeth Inga-Saavedra, Rosa María Rodríguez-Alonso, Silvia Guil-Luna, María Auxiliadora Gómez-España, Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza, Enrique Aranda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. MedComm · 2026
    Article
  4. Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

María Victoria García-Ortiz *Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain. mvictoria.garcia@imibic.org.
Pablo Cano-Ramírez *Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
Marta Toledano-FonsecaMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
María Teresa CanoMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
Elizabeth Inga-SaavedraMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
Rosa María Rodríguez-AlonsoMedical Oncology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Silvia Guil-LunaMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
María Auxiliadora Gómez-EspañaMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio Rodríguez-ArizaMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain. antonio.rodriguez.exts@juntadeandalucia.es.
Enrique ArandaMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESRoche (Spain) · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESUniversity of Córdoba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer is the most lethal cancer with a dismal prognosis mainly due to diagnosis at advanced stage and ineffective treatments. CA19-9 levels and computed tomography (CT) imaging are the main standard criteria for evaluating disease progression and treatment response. In this study we explored liquid biopsy-based epigenetic biomarkers for prognosis and monitoring disease in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

methodsPlasma samples were collected from 44 mPDAC patients at the time of diagnosis, and in 15 of them, additional samples were obtained during follow-up of the disease. After cell-free DNA (cfDNA), isolation circulating levels of methylated NPTX2, SPARC, BMP3, SFRP1 and TFPI2 genes were measured using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). BEAMing technique was performed for quantitation of RAS mutations in cfDNA, and CA19-9 was measured using standard techniques.

resultsNPTX2 was the most highly and frequently methylated gene in cfDNA samples from mPDAC patients. Higher circulating NPTX2 methylation levels at diagnosis were associated with poor prognosis and efficiently stratified patients for prediction of overall survival (6.06% cut-off, p = 0.0067). Dynamics of circulating NPTX2 methylation levels correlated with disease progression and response to therapy and predicted better than CA19-9 the evolution of disease in mPDAC patients. Remarkably, in many cases the disease progression detected by CT scan was anticipated by an increase in circulating NPTX2 methylation levels.

conclusionsOur study supports circulating NPTX2 methylation levels as a promising liquid biopsy-based clinical tool for non-invasive prognosis, monitoring disease evolution and response to treatment in mPDAC patients.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenDisease ProgressionDNA MethylationHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCA19-9ddPCRDNA methylationEpigenetic biomarkerLiquid biopsyNPTX2Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPrognostic biomarkerRAS

Identifiers

PMID37481552
PMCPMC10362605
OpenAlexW4385074567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.