Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37481548›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2023

Physical, mechanical, and biological properties of collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: a comparative in vitro study.

Xiaolu Shi, Xianjing Li, Ye Tian, Xinyao Qu, Shaobo Zhai, Yang Liu, Wei Jia, Yan Cui, Shunli Chu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Natural Polymers in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Active and Passive Mineralization of Bio-GideJournal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolu ShiDepartment of Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xianjing LiDepartment of Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xinyao QuDepartment of Drug Clinical Trial, the Affiliated Hospital to Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Shaobo ZhaiDepartment of Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Wei JiaYongchang Community Health Service Center of Chaoyang District, Changchun, China.
Yan Cui *Department of Dermatology and Venereology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China. supermandsdzam@jlu.edu.cn.
Shunli Chu *Department of Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China. chusl@jlu.edu.cn.
Jilin University · CNBeijing Chaoyang Emergency Medical Center · CNThe Affiliated Hospital to Changchun University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide a reference for clinical selection of collagen membranes by analyzing the properties of three kinds of collagen membranes widely used in clinics: Bio-Gide membrane from porcine dermis (PD), Heal-All membrane from bovine dermis (BD), and Lyoplant membrane from bovine pericardium (BP).

methodsThe barrier function of three kinds of collagen membranes were evaluated by testing the surface morphology, mechanical properties, hydrophilicity, and degradation rate of collagen membranes in collagenase and artificial saliva. In addition, the bioactivity of each collagen membrane as well as the proliferation and osteogenesis of MC3T3-E1 cells were evaluated. Mass spectrometry was also used to analyze the degradation products.

resultsThe BP membrane had the highest tensile strength and Young's modulus as well as the largest water contact angle. The PD membrane exhibited the highest elongation at break, the smallest water contact angle, and the lowest degradation weight loss. The BD membrane had the highest degradation weight loss, the highest number of proteins in its degradation product, the strongest effect on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells, and the highest expression level of osteogenic genes.

conclusionsThe PD membrane is the best choice for shaping and maintenance time, while the BD membrane is good for osteogenesis, and the BP membrane is suitable for spatial maintenance. To meet the clinical requirements of guided bone regeneration, using two different kinds of collagen membranes concurrently to exert their respective advantages is an option worth considering.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationCollagenAnimalsCattleResearch DesignSwineThinnessWaterWeight LossCollagenWaterBarrier membraneBioactivityCollagen membraneDegradation productsGuided bone regeneration

Identifiers

PMID37481548
PMCPMC10362553
OpenAlexW4385075214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.