Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37481530›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2023

Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture.

Joanna Paladino, Justin J Sanders, Erik K Fromme, Susan Block, Juliet C Jacobsen, Vicki A Jackson, Christine S Ritchie, Suzanne Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Toward compassionate communication: a rapid review on facilitating the dementia disclosure process.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Exploring Patients' Perceptions of an Advance Care Planning Intervention in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Values elicitation among surgical oncologists: Findings from an international survey.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Experience implementing the serious illness care program through virtual training of multidisciplinary teams at a regional cancer centre.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna PaladinoMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. jpaladino@mgh.harvard.edu.
Justin J SandersMcGill University, Montreal, CA, Canada.
Erik K FrommeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Susan BlockHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Juliet C JacobsenMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Vicki A JacksonMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine S RitchieMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Suzanne MitchellUMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCommunication about patients' values, goals, and prognosis in serious illness (serious illness communication) is a cornerstone of person-centered care yet difficult to implement in practice. As part of Serious Illness Care Program implementation in five health systems, we studied the clinical culture-related factors that supported or impeded improvement in serious illness conversations.

methodsQualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of clinical leaders, implementation teams, and frontline champions.

resultsWe completed 30 interviews across palliative care, oncology, primary care, and hospital medicine. Participants identified four culture-related domains that influenced serious illness communication improvement: (1) clinical paradigms; (2) interprofessional empowerment; (3) perceived conversation impact; (4) practice norms. Changes in clinicians' beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in these domains supported values and goals conversations, including: shifting paradigms about serious illness communication from 'end-of-life planning' to 'knowing and honoring what matters most to patients;' improvements in psychological safety that empowered advanced practice clinicians, nurses and social workers to take expanded roles; experiencing benefits of earlier values and goals conversations; shifting from avoidant norms to integration norms in which earlier serious illness discussions became part of routine processes. Culture-related inhibitors included: beliefs that conversations are about dying or withdrawing care; attitudes that serious illness communication is the physician's job; discomfort managing emotions; lack of reliable processes.

conclusionsAspects of clinical culture, such as paradigms about serious illness communication and inter-professional empowerment, are linked to successful adoption of serious illness communication. Further research is warranted to identify effective strategies to enhance clinical culture and drive clinician practice change.

Indexed as

CommunicationHospice and Palliative Care NursingDeathEmotionsHumansQualitative ResearchClinical cultureGoals of carePatient-provider communicationQuality improvementSerious illness communication

Identifiers

PMID37481530
PMCPMC10362669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.