Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37481506›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2023

Sexting Among Australian Adolescents: Risk and Protective Factors.

Dominika Howard, Hannah K Jarman, Elizabeth M Clancy, Heidi M Renner, Rachel Smith, Bosco Rowland, John W Toumbourou, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Bianca Klettke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominika HowardFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. dominika.howard@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7874-2616
Hannah K JarmanFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Elizabeth M ClancyFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Heidi M RennerFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Rachel SmithFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Bosco RowlandFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
John W ToumbourouFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Matthew Fuller-TyszkiewiczFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Bianca KlettkeFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although consensual sending of sexts between adolescents is considered developmentally appropriate, it may also entail a range of negative consequences. Current sexting research lacks a comprehensive theoretical framework identifying a range of risk and protective factors underpinning adolescent consensual sending of sexts across individual, interpersonal, and distal levels. Further, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of how the importance of these factors may vary across adolescent age. This study investigated the utility of the Social Development Model to predict a range of risk and protective factors across individual, family, peer, school, and community-level factors. The sample included 1302 teenagers from Victoria, Australia (M

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorText MessagingAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupProtective FactorsSexual BehaviorVictoriaAdolescentsRisk and protective factorsSextingSocial Development Model

Identifiers

PMID37481506
PMCPMC10372109
OpenAlexW4385073459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.