Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37481492›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

2022 PSOGI Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Vahan Kepenekian, Olivia Sgarbura, Frederic Marchal, Laurent Villeneuve, Shigeki Kusamura, Marcello Deraco

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review of 2022 PSOGI/RENAPE Consensus on HIPEC.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Vahan KepenekianService de Chirurgie Oncologique et Digestive, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Université Lyon-1, Pierre-Bénite, Oullins, France. vahan.kepenekian@chu-lyon.fr.
Olivia SgarburaSurgical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Frederic MarchalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Laurent VilleneuveFaculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, CICLY, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Shigeki KusamuraPeritoneal Malignancy Program, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marcello DeracoPeritoneal Malignancy Program, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare and aggressive primary peritoneal disease, with recommended treatment, in eligible patients, of a combination of complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As treatment is multimodal, there is a wide heterogeneity of HIPEC protocols precluding clear comparisons. Standardization at an international level is required.

methodsThe Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) designated a steering committee to produce consensus recommendations for HIPEC regimens, adapted to each etiology. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used, based on a systematic review focused on main outcomes related to HIPEC regimens in DMPM patients and on the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) method to elaborate main questions. An opinion survey was added. Furthermore, a Delphi process was performed with voting from a panel of international experts.

resultsEleven questions were elaborated, including two for future research requirements and three to assess the HIPEC regimen preference of the panel. The level of evidence underlying questions was globally low. Overall, 75 (86%) and 67 (77%) of the 87 invited experts completed the vote at the first and second round, respectively. HIPEC following complete CRS was strongly supported by 88% of voters with no need to plan comparative studies with CRS alone for 61.2% of voters. Bi-drug regimens appeared to be preferred to mono-drug ones and cisplatin was globally favored. The opinion survey confirmed the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin as the recommended regimen.

conclusionInternational consensus confirmed the indication of HIPEC following complete CRS in DMPM patients and recommended cisplatin-doxorubicin as the first-line HIPEC regimen.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDoxorubicinHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesCisplatinDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID37481492
OpenAlexW4385144424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.