Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37481059›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2023

Assessment of personal care product use and perceptions of use in a sample of US adults affiliated with a university in the Northeast.

Adana A M Llanos, Amber Rockson, Kylie Getz, Patricia Greenberg, Eva Portillo, Jasmine A McDonald, Dede K Teteh, Justin Villasenor, Carolina Lozada, Jamirra Franklin and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07216898 (You Have the Right to Know), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07216898 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

You Have the Right to Know: Empowering Women Through Clean Beauty Research and Education

TypeobservationalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled38ConditionsHealth Disparities, EducationArmsChemical Exposure Prevention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Adana A M LlanosDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: al4248@cumc.columbia.edu.
Amber RocksonDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kylie GetzDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Patricia GreenbergDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Eva PortilloBiostatistics Epidemiology Summer Training (BEST) Diversity Program, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jasmine A McDonaldDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dede K TetehDepartment of Health Sciences, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.
Justin VillasenorBiostatistics Epidemiology Summer Training (BEST) Diversity Program, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carolina LozadaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jamirra FranklinEnvironmental and Health Sciences Department, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vaishnavi MoreDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA.
Zorimar Rivera-NúñezDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Carolyn W KinkadeEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Emily S BarrettDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · USChapman University · USCollege of New Jersey · USSpelman College · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence supports unequal burdens of chemical exposures from personal care products (PCPs) among some groups, namely femme-identifying and racial and ethnic minorities. In this study, we implemented an online questionnaire to assess PCP purchasing and usage behaviors and perceptions of use among a sample of US adults recruited at a Northeastern university. We collected PCP use across seven product categories (hair, beauty, skincare, perfumes/colognes, feminine hygiene, oral care, other), and behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions of use and safety across sociodemographic factors to evaluate relationships between sociodemographic factors and the total number of products used within the prior 24-48 h using multivariable models. We also summarized participants' perceptions and attitudes. Among 591 adults (20.0% Asian American/Pacific Islander [AAPI], 5.9% Hispanic, 9.6% non-Hispanic Black [NHB], 54.6% non-Hispanic White [NHW], and 9.9% multiracial or other), the average number of PCPs used within the prior 24-48 h was 15.6 ± 7.7. PCP use was greater among females than males (19.0 vs. 7.9, P < 0.01) and varied by race and ethnicity among females. Relative to NHWs, AAPI females used fewer hair products (2.5 vs. 3.1) and more feminine hygiene products (1.5 vs. 1.1), NHB females used more hair products (3.8 vs. 3.1), perfumes (1.0 vs. 0.6), oral care (2.3 vs. 1.9), and feminine hygiene products (1.8 vs. 1.1), and multiracial or other females used more oral care (2.2 vs. 1.9) and feminine hygiene products (1.5 vs. 1.1) (P-values <0.05). Generally, study participants reported moderate concern about exposures and health effects from using PCPs, with few differences by gender, race, and ethnicity. These findings add to the extant literature on PCP use across sociodemographic characteristics. Improving the understanding of patterns of use for specific products and their chemical ingredients is critical for developing interventions to reduce these exposures, especially in vulnerable groups with an unequal burden of exposure.

Indexed as

CosmeticsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew EnglandPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultCosmeticsChemical exposuresEnvironmental injusticeGenderperceptions of harmPersonal care productsRace and ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID37481059
PMCPMC10592243
OpenAlexW4384926833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.