ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Accurate measurement of magnetic resonance parkinsonism index by a fully automatic and deep learning quantification pipeline.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Radiologist Productivity with Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Faster, More Practical, but Still Accurate: Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims at a fully automatic pipeline for measuring the magnetic resonance parkinsonism index (MRPI) using deep learning methods.
methodsMRPI is defined as the product of the pons area to the midbrain area ratio and the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) width to the superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP) width ratio. In our proposed pipeline, we first used nnUNet to segment the brainstem and then employed HRNet to identify two key boundary points so as to sub-divide the whole brainstem into midbrain and pons. HRNet was also employed to predict the MCP endpoints for measuring the MCP width. Finally, we segmented the SCP on an oblique coronal plane and calculated its width. A total of 400 T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were used to train the nnUNet and HRNet models. Five-fold cross-validation was conducted to evaluate our proposed pipeline's performance on the training dataset. We also evaluated the performance of our proposed pipeline on three external datasets. Two of them had two raters manually measuring the MRPI values, providing insights into automatic accuracy versus inter-rater variability.
resultsWe obtained average absolute percentage errors (APEs) of 17.21%, 18.17%, 20.83%, and 22.83% on the training dataset and the three external validation datasets, while the inter-rater average APE measured on the first two external validation datasets was 11.31%. Our proposed pipeline significantly improved the MRPI quantification accuracy over a representative state-of-the-art traditional approach (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe proposed automatic pipeline can accurately predict MRPI that is comparable with manual measurement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study presents an automated magnetic resonance parkinsonism index measurement tool that can analyze large amounts of magnetic resonance images, enhance the efficiency of Parkinsonism-Plus syndrome diagnosis, reduce the workload of clinicians, and minimize the impact of human factors on diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • We propose an automatic pipeline for measuring the magnetic resonance parkinsonism index from magnetic resonance images. • The effectiveness of the proposed pipeline is successfully established on multiple datasets and comparisons with inter-rater measurements. • The proposed pipeline significantly outperforms a state-of-the-art quantification approach, being much closer to ground truth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.