Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480546›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Development of an eHealth-enhanced model of care for the monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

André Manuel da Silva Lopes, Sara Colomer-Lahiguera, Célia Darnac, Stellio Giacomini, Sébastien Bugeia, Garance Gutknecht, Gilliosa Spurrier-Bernard, Veronica Aedo-Lopez, Nuria Mederos, Sofiya Latifyan and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Wellbeing status and priority concerns of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results of the EONS PROMs project international online survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Co-design of an electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring system for immunotherapy toxicities.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Learning about and living with toxicity: a qualitative study of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma or lung cancer and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

André Manuel da Silva LopesInstitute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1463-9609
Sara Colomer-LahigueraInstitute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-5198
Célia DarnacInstitute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stellio GiacominiInstitute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sébastien BugeiaDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland.
Garance GutknechtDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland.
Gilliosa Spurrier-BernardMelanomeFrance, Teilhet, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-7275
Veronica Aedo-LopezPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-4508
Nuria MederosDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-0721
Sofiya LatifyanDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-069X
Alfredo AddedoDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland.
Olivier MichielinDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-6355
Manuela EicherInstitute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. manuela.eicher@unil.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-0719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) data in routine care has been tied to direct patient benefits such as improved quality of care and symptom control and even overall survival. The modes of action behind such benefits are seldom described in detail. Here, we describe the development of a model of care leveraging ePRO data to monitor and manage symptoms of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

methodsDevelopment was split into four stages: (1) identification of an underlying theoretical framework, (2) the selection of an ePRO measure (ePROM), (3) the adaptation of an electronic application to collect ePRO data, and (4) the description of an ePRO-oriented workflow. The model of care is currently evaluated in a bicentric longitudinal randomized controlled phase II trial, the IePRO study.

resultsThe IePRO model of care is grounded in the eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model. Patients are prompted to report symptoms using an electronic mobile application. Triage nurses are alerted, review the reported symptoms, and contact patients in case of a new or worsening symptom. Nurses use the UKONS 24-hour telephone triage tool to issue patient management recommendations to the oncology team. Adapted care coordinating procedures facilitate team collaboration and provide patients with timely feedback.

conclusionThis report clarifies how components of care are created and modified to leverage ePRO to enhance care. The model describes a workflow that enables care teams to be proactive and provide patients with timely, multidisciplinary support to manage symptoms.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMedical OncologyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune-related adverse eventsModel of carePatient-reported outcomesRemote symptom managementSelf-management support

Identifiers

PMID37480546
PMCPMC10363070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.