Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480525›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Salvage prostate bed plus elective pelvic node radiation without androgen deprivation therapy.

Gregory P Swanson, Kendall Hammonds, Sameer Jhavar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 70% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory P SwansonBaylor Scott and White Health, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX, 76508, USA.
Kendall HammondsBaylor Scott and White Health, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX, 76508, USA.
Sameer JhavarBaylor Scott and White Health, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX, 76508, USA. Sameer.Jhavar@BSWHealth.org.
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple · USBaylor Scott & White Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCA) after radical prostatectomy (RP), there is limited data on the effectiveness of adding elective pelvic nodal radiation (EPNI) to salvage prostate bed radiation (PBRT) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to prevent progression. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective chart review of 326 patients treated for BCR of PCA from a single institution was performed to capture baseline pre-operative PSA, pathologic details, post-operative PSA, treatment details (radiation and ADT), subsequent failure (rising PSA), response to radiation, and subsequent outcomes after radiation.

resultsBetween 2004 through 2017, 326 patients received PBRT. Majority (n = 253; 78%) did not receive ADT. Majority received EPNI (n = 227; 90%) with salvage PBRT (n = 213; 94%). The median pre-PBRT PSA was 0.50 ng/ml (0.10-75.60 ng/ml). Of the patients that did not receive ADT, 83% (210/253) achieved an undetectable (< 0.2 ng/ml) PSA after salvage PBRT. After a median follow-up of 87 months, 172 (53%) patients were without a rising PSA and 50 (15%) developed metastatic disease.

conclusionOutcomes with salvage PBRT plus EPNI without ADT appear comparable to salvage PBRT plus EPNI plus ADT. These results need confirmation in a randomized setting.

Indexed as

Androgen deprivation therapyPelvic nodeProstate cancerRadiotherapySalvage

Identifiers

PMID37480525
PMCPMC11796533
OpenAlexW4385074379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.