Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480443›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024

Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review.

Grant Bruno, Titus A Chan, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Emily Coombs, Indigenous Relations Circle, David Nicholas

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grant BrunoDepartment of Pediatrics, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405- 87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada. gcbruno@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-5048
Titus A Chan, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0252-8856
Lonnie ZwaigenbaumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta c/o Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, 10230 111th Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5G 0B, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-0799
Emily CoombsDepartment of Educational Psychology, Counselling Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-0003
Indigenous Relations Circle
David NicholasFaculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4480-322X
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently there is a severe lack of research on autism and Indigenous people in Canada. This scoping review explores this literature gap and assesses the same literature from an Indigenous perspective. Scoping reviews are an effective means to explore the literature in a specific area, in this case, autism and Indigenous people in Canada. We explored existing literature as it pertains to Indigenous populations and autism in Canada. To support this review, the Indigenous Quality Assessment Tool (QAT) was adapted to appraise the quality of literature. In total, there were a total of 212 articles identified of which 24 met the inclusion criteria: (1) some focus on autism, (2) a component specific to Indigenous people, and (3) specific to Canada. Of the 24 articles and reports, 15 were peer-reviewed and the rest considered grey literature. Most articles focused on program delivery with some literature using primary data (quantitative and/or qualitative). Overall, the quality of the research was appraised as poor, as determined by the QAT. Findings reaffirm the critical need for research that addresses autism in Indigenous communities within Canada and show the importance of having research done in full partnership with, or led by, Indigenous people.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderCanadaHumansIndigenous CanadiansAutismCanadaIndigenousIndigenous Quality Assessment Tool (IQAT)Scoping Review

Identifiers

PMID37480443
PMCPMC11362183
OpenAlexW4385074406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.