Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480418›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Meludia platform as a tool to evaluate music perception in pediatric and adult cochlear implant users.

Miryam Calvino, Alejandro Zuazua, Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado, Javier Gavilán, Marta Mancheño, Helena Arroyo, Luis Lassaletta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Spanish translation and validation of the Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MuRQoL) in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miryam CalvinoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. miryamcf@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3301-2185
Alejandro ZuazuaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Sanchez-CuadradoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Javier GavilánDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Marta MancheñoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Helena ArroyoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Luis LassalettaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ES

Funding

Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento del Sistema Español de I+D+I, ISCiii, Spain. PI21/00147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMusic perception is one of the greatest challenges for cochlear implant (CI) users. The aims of this study were: (i) to evaluate the music perception of CI users using the online Meludia music training program as music testing platform, (ii) to compare performance among three age groups, and (iii) to compare CI users with their normal hearing (NH) peers.

methods138 individuals participated, divided between children (6-10 y), adolescents (11-16 y), and adults (≥ 17 y). Five music perception tasks were evaluated: Rhythm, Spatialization, Stable/unstable, Melody, and Density. We also administered the music related quality of life (MuRQoL) questionnaire for adults, and a music questionnaire for pediatric population (6-16 y) (MuQPP).

resultsA significantly higher percentage of the adolescent CI users completed the five tasks compared to the other age groups. Both pediatric and adolescent CI users had similar performance to their NH peers in most categories. On the MuRQoL, adult NH listeners reported more music exposure than CI users (3.8 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 0.6, p < 0.01), but both groups reported similar levels of perceived music importance (3.4 ± 0.7 vs 3.2 ± 1.1, p = 0.340). On the MuQPP, pediatric CI users who scored highly on music perception also had higher reported questionnaire scores (54.2 ± 12.9 vs 40.9 ± 12.1, p = 0.009).

conclusionsMeludia can be used to evaluate music perception and to use for music training in CI users of all ages. Adolescents had the highest performance in most musical tasks. Pediatric CI users were more similar to their NH peers. The importance of music in adult CI users was comparable to their NH peers.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsMusicAdolescentAdultChildHumansPerceptionQuality of LifeAdolescentAudiologyCochlear implantCognitive trainingMusicPaediatricRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37480418
PMCPMC10796694
OpenAlexW4385074021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.