Observational studyPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
The manifestations of metabolic acidosis during acetazolamide treatment in a cohort of pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Observational study in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acetazolamide-induced metabolic acidosis in pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension: associations with bone mineral density, growth, and kidney function.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Association between base excess levels and clinical outcomes among very low birth weight infants: a multicenter birth cohort study in South Korea.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- When our treatment is complicated: an overview of drug-induced acid-base disorders: part 1-acidosis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic intracranial hypertension is characterized by increased intracranial pressure with unidentified pathology. Despite its use as the first-line treatment, data on acetazolamide's effectiveness and safety in pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension is sparse. This study's objective was to assess those issues and the need for routine blood gas monitoring during treatment.
methodsRetrospective observational cohort study, based on multicenter computerized medical charts of pediatric patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension diagnosed between 2007-2018 in three medical centers serving one metropolitan area (an estimated population of 400,000 children). Clinical and laboratory data of children up to 18 years old, fulfilling the Friedman criteria and taking acetazolamide, were collected and analyzed.
resultsSixty-eight patients were included with a mean acetazolamide treatment duration of 8.5 months and a median maximal dose 18 mg/kg/d. Sixty-two children had mild (76%), moderate (13%), or severe (1.5%) metabolic acidosis. At least one adverse effect (neurologic, gastrointestinal, renal) was recorded among 27% of patients. No significant difference was found between the mean pH of children with or without clinical adverse effects (p = 0.35). No correlation was found between laboratory acidosis and adverse effect severity (p = 0.3), or between median acetazolamide dose and acidosis level (p = 0.57).
conclusionsAlthough laboratory finding of metabolic acidosis is common among patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension treated with acetazolamide, it is not correlated with clinics. Therefore, we recommend sending blood tests during acetazolamide treatment based on clinical judgment. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.