Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480144›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2023

The relative value of Pre-Implementation stages for successful implementation of evidence-informed programs.

Zoe M Alley, Jason E Chapman, Holle Schaper, Lisa Saldana

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06375551 (Refining and Pilot Testing a Decision Support Intervention to Facilitate Adoption of Evidence-Based Programs to Improve Parent and Child Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06375551 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Refining and Pilot Testing a Decision Support Intervention to Facilitate Adoption of Evidence-Based Programs to Improve Parent and Child Mental Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorChestnut Health SystemsRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsChild Abuse, Decision Making, Child Welfare, Decision Making, SharedArmsOptimizing Responses with Collaborative Assessments-Automated (ORCA-A), Optimizing Responses with Collaborative Assessments-Live (ORCA-L)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zoe M AlleyOregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
Jason E ChapmanOregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
Holle SchaperOregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
Lisa SaldanaOregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA. lsaldana@chestnut.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0792-6290

Funding

Facilitating Sustainment Through Implementation Feedback: The SIC Coaching ModelR01DA044745 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI SALDANA, LISA · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost implementations fail before the corresponding services are ever delivered. Measuring implementation process fidelity may reveal when and why these attempts fail. This knowledge is necessary to support the achievement of positive implementation milestones, such as delivering services to clients (program start-up) and competency in treatment delivery. The present study evaluates the extent to which implementation process fidelity at different implementation stages predicts achievement of those milestones.

methodsImplementation process fidelity data-as measured by the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)-from 1287 implementing sites across 27 evidence-informed programs were examined in mixed effects regression models with sites nested within programs. Implementation process fidelity, as measured by the proportion of implementation activities completed during the three stages of the SIC Pre-Implementation phase and overall Pre-Implementation (Phase 1) and Implementation (Phase 2) proportion scores, was assessed as a predictor of sites achieving program start-up (i.e., delivering services) and competency in program delivery.

resultsThe predicted probability of start-up across all sites was low at 35% (95% CI [33%, 38%]). When considering the evidence-informed program being implemented, that probability was nearly twice as high (64%; 95% CI [42%, 82%]), and 57% of the total variance in program start-up was attributable to the program. Implementation process fidelity was positively and significantly associated with achievement of program start-up and competency. The magnitude of this relationship varied significantly across programs for Pre-Implementation Stage 1 (i.e., Engagement) only. Compared to other stages, completing more Pre-Implementation Stage 3 (Readiness Planning) activities resulted in the most rapid gains in probability of achieving program start-up. The predicted probability of achieving competency was very low unless sites had high scores in both Pre-Implementation and Implementation phases.

conclusionsStrong implementation process fidelity-as measured by SIC Pre-Implementation and Implementation phase proportion scores-was associated with sites' achievement of program start-up and competency in program delivery, with early implementation process fidelity being especially potent. These findings highlight the importance of a rigorous Pre-Implementation process.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeKnowledgeImplementation fidelityPre-ImplementationStages of implementation completion

Identifiers

PMID37480144
PMCPMC10362770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.