Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480135›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

Implementation research priorities for addressing the maternal health crisis in the USA: results from a modified Delphi study among researchers.

Rebecca F Hamm, Michelle H Moniz, Inaya Wahid, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru, Implementation Science for Maternal Health National Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca F HammMaternal and Child Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michelle H MonizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Inaya WahidDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rachel Blankstein BremanDepartment of Partnerships, Professional Education and Practice, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer A Callaghan-KoruOffice of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Springdale, AR, USA. jck@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-1702
Implementation Science for Maternal Health National Working Group
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Michigan · USDrexel University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Expanding Access to Pregnancy Specific Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in Jail: Piloting and Adaptable Implementation Strategy to Advance Equitable and Patient-Centered CareR34DA056014 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUFRIN, CAROLYN · 2023 to 2025
$737k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA056014NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal health outcomes in the USA are far worse than in peer nations. Increasing implementation research in maternity care is critical to addressing quality gaps and unwarranted variations in care. Implementation research priorities have not yet been defined or well represented in the plans for maternal health research investments in the USA.

methodsThis descriptive study used a modified Delphi method to solicit and rank research priorities at the intersection of implementation science and maternal health through two sequential web-based surveys. A purposeful, yet broad sample of researchers with relevant subject matter knowledge was identified through searches of published articles and grant databases. The surveys addressed five implementation research areas in maternal health: (1) practices to prioritize for broader implementation, (2) practices to prioritize for de-implementation, (3) research questions about implementation determinants, (4) research questions about implementation strategies, and (5) research questions about methods/measures.

resultsOf 160 eligible researchers, 82 (51.2%) agreed to participate. Participants were predominantly female (90%) and White (75%). Sixty completed at least one of two surveys. The practices that participants prioritized for broader implementation were improved postpartum care, perinatal and postpartum mood disorder screening and management, and standardized management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. For de-implementation, practices believed to be most impactful if removed from or reduced in maternity care were cesarean delivery for low-risk patients and routine discontinuation of all psychiatric medications during pregnancy. The top methodological priorities of participants were improving the extent to which implementation science frameworks and measures address equity and developing approaches for involving patients in implementation research.

conclusionsThrough a web-based Delphi exercise, we identified implementation research priorities that researchers consider to have the greatest potential to improve the quality of maternity care in the USA. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using modified Delphi approaches to engage researchers in setting implementation research priorities within a clinical area.

Indexed as

Delphi methodImplementation scienceMaternal healthPriority settingResearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID37480135
PMCPMC10360260
OpenAlexW4385064080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.