Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480127›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023

The most important problems and needs of rasopathy patients with a noonan syndrome spectrum disorder.

Dagmar K Tiemens, Lotte Kleimeier, Erika Leenders, Ellen Wingbermühle, Renee L Roelofs, Barbara Sibbles, Floor S M Oostwegel, Eva Vroonland, Conny van Leeuwen, Hanneke Niessen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Precision medicine in neuropsychiatric disorders: Still a long way to go.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dagmar K TiemensDepartment of Pediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lotte KleimeierDepartment of Pediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Erika LeendersDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ellen WingbermühleDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Renee L RoelofsCentre of Excellence for Neuropsychiatry, Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands.
Barbara SibblesDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Floor S M OostwegelFaculty of Earth and Life Science, Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva VroonlandPGOsupport, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Conny van LeeuwenDutch Noonan Syndrome Foundation, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
Hanneke NiessenDutch Noonan Syndrome Foundation, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
Paul SonnegaDutch Noonan Syndrome Foundation, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
Anniek DuursmaDutch Noonan Syndrome Foundation, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
Michel A A P WillemsenDepartment of Pediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jos M T DraaismaDepartment of Pediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Jos.draaisma@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-6173
Carina A C M PittensFaculty of Earth and Life Science, Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLHersenstichting · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoonan syndrome spectrum disorders (NSSDs) constitute a group within the Rasopathies, and are one of the largest groups of syndromes with impact on multi-organ involvement known. The extreme variability of the clinical phenotype is, among others, due to the numerous different genes that are involved, and the differences in clinical presentation over the life span. We have studied the needs of patients and their relatives aiming to develop, evaluate and choose focus in research, medical care and policy to better meet their perspectives.

methodsUsing the participatory and interactive Dialogue method, 80 patients and relatives mentioned 53 different problems or needs (topics) that were categorized into eight themes. These themes and the topics within each theme, were subsequently prioritized by putting them in order of importance methodologically.

resultsThe four highest prioritized themes were: (1) Physical problems (non-musculoskeletal related); (2) Social, emotional and behavioral problems; (3) Cognitive functioning and information processing; and (4) Problems related to the musculoskeletal system. Nineteen out of the 53 topics were physical problems. According to the total group of respondents, the top 3 prioritized topics within theme 1 were coagulation problems, heart problems, and feeding problems. Also data stratified by age groups, phenotype (NS and other NSSDs) and gender showed some remarkable results. For instance, feeding problems were prioritized as the most important topic of the highest prioritized theme, according to patients aged 0-12 years. Also feeding problems show a significant difference in its prioritization according to female patients (2) compared to male patients (7). On the other hand, heart problems were not mentioned in the top three prioritized topics in the youngest age groups, although heart problems are generally considered most important for patients with NSSD.

conclusionsWith our results we underline the importance of methodologically inventorying the needs of NSSD patients, not only at the group level, but to also focus on specific needs according to e.g. age, phenotype and gender. For instance, it is remarkable that both the current Clinical Guidelines and the Noonan Syndrome diagnostic criteria give little to no attention to feeding problems, though our results indicate that, to the youngest patients, these problems have top priority. A similar situation appears to apply to the clinical management of e.g. coagulation, neuropsychological and musculoskeletal problems (like physiotherapy or occupational therapy) and to a need for (educational) tools to support patients at school or at work. Our study may help to shape targeted (clinical) management, research and policy inside and outside medical (research) institutes and shed light on the complex phenotypes of NSSDs, the families' and patients' perspectives on the everyday consequences of the many different problems, as well as their needs.

Indexed as

Noonan SyndromeCognitionFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeClinical guidelinesCoagulation problemsCognitive and behavioral functioningEducationEnergyERK1/2Feeding problemsMusculoskeletal systemNoonan Syndrome Spectrum DisordersPainPatient involvementRas/MAPK pathwayRasopathies

Identifiers

PMID37480127
PMCPMC10362585
OpenAlexW4384942673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.