Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480095›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2023

DCF versus doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matching study.

Stefano Kim, Véronique Vendrely, Angélique Saint, Thierry André, Pauline Vaflard, Emmanuelle Samalin, Simon Pernot, Oliver Bouché, Mustapha Zubir, Jérôme Desrame and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano KimClinical Investigational Center, INSERM CIC-1431, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France. stefano.kim@univ-fcomte.fr.
Véronique VendrelyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France.
Angélique SaintDepartment of Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Thierry AndréSorbonne Université and Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Pauline VaflardDepartment of Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle SamalinDepartment of Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Simon PernotDepartment of Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Oliver BouchéDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
Mustapha ZubirDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, Paris, France.
Jérôme DesrameDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
Christelle de la FouchardièreDepartment of Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Denis SmithDepartment of Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
François GhiringhelliDepartment of Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Angélique VienotClinical Investigational Center, INSERM CIC-1431, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Marion JacquinClinical Investigational Center, INSERM CIC-1431, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Elodie KlajerDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Thierry NguyenDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Éric FrançoisDepartment of Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Julien TaiebDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Université Paris-Cité, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris, France.
Karine Le MalicotFédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
Dewi VernereyINSERM Unit 1098, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Aurélia MeurisseINSERM Unit 1098, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Christophe BorgClinical Investigational Center, INSERM CIC-1431, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRFédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive · FRHôpital Privé Jean Mermo · FRInserm · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut Curie · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRMethodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triplet DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-flurouracil) and doublet CP/CF (carboplatin and paclitaxel/cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) regimens were prospectively evaluated in advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma (SCCA), and validated as standard treatments. Even though the high efficacy and good tolerance of DCF regimen were confirmed in 3 independent prospective trials, doublet CP regimen is still recommended in several guidelines based in its better safety profile with similar efficacy compared to CF regimen. We performed a propensity score-adjusted method with inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) and matched case control (MCC) comparison among patients with metastatic or non-resectable locally advanced recurrent SCCA, treated with chemotherapy as first line regimen. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS). 247 patients were included for analysis. 154 patients received DCF and 93 patients received a doublet regimen. The median OS was 32.3 months with DCF and 18.3 months with doublet regimens (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.38-0.74; p = 0.0001), and the median PFS was 11.2 months with DCF versus 7.6 months with doublet regimens (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.39-0.73; p < 0.0001). The hazard ratios by IPTW and MCC analyses were 0.411 (95% CI, 0.324-0.521; p < 0.0001) and 0.406 (95% CI, 0.261-0.632; p < 0.0001) for OS, and 0.466 (95% CI, 0.376-0.576; p < 0.0001) and 0.438 (95% CI, 0.298-0.644; P < 0.0001) for PFS. The triplet DCF regimen provides a high and significant benefit in OS and PFS over doublet regimens, and should be considered as upfront treatment for eligible patients with advanced SCCA.

Indexed as

AdvancedAnal carcinomaChemotherapyDocetaxelMetastatic

Identifiers

PMID37480095
PMCPMC10362607
OpenAlexW4385064382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.