Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37480010›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

"Figuring stuff out myself" - a qualitative study on maternal vaccination in socially and ethnically diverse areas in England.

Sima Berendes, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Oyinkansola Ojo-Aromokudu, Alice Ivory, Joseph D Tucker, Heidi J Larson, Caroline Free

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Perceived barriers to accessing vaccination plans in pregnant women in Chile: a qualitative analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sima BerendesDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. sima.berendes@lshtm.ac.uk.
Sandra Mounier-JackDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Oyinkansola Ojo-AromokuduDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alice IvoryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Joseph D TuckerDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Heidi J LarsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Caroline FreeDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal vaccinations against Influenza, Pertussis, and Covid-19 are recommended in the UK, and vaccines against further infections may become available soon. However, many pregnant women, especially in socially and ethnically diverse areas, have low vaccine uptake. Qualitative studies on the reasons and possible solutions are needed that are inclusive of disadvantaged and minority ethnic groups. We therefore aimed to understand the complex interplay between structural and behavioural factors contributing to the low maternal vaccine uptake in socially and ethnically diverse areas in London in the Covid-19 context.

methodsIn 2022, we conducted semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion among a purposive sample of 38 pregnant/recently pregnant women and 20 health service providers, including 12 midwives. Participants were recruited in ethnically diverse London boroughs. We followed a critical realist paradigm and used a thematic analysis approach.

resultsThe sample included participants who took all, some or none of the maternal vaccines, with some participants unsure whether they had taken or been offered the vaccines. Decision-making was passive or active, with the expectation for pregnant women to do their 'own research'. Participants described various individual, social and contextual influences on their decision-making as they navigated the antenatal care system. Missing or conflicting information from providers meant knowledge gaps were sometimes filled with misinformation from unreliable sources that increased uncertainties and mistrust. Both pregnant women and providers described structural and organisational factors that hindered access to information and vaccinations, including lack of training, time and resources, and shortcomings of health information systems and apps. Some participants described factors that facilitated vaccination uptake and many made recommendations for improvements.

conclusionsOur study showed how structural and organisational factors can compound uncertainties around maternal vaccination among socially and ethnically diverse populations. Results highlight the need for more reliable resources, streamlined workflows, improved electronic information systems and training in their use. Roles and responsibilities should be clarified with potential greater involvement of nurses and pharmacists in vaccine provision. Education and communication should consider individual (language/digital) skills and needs for information and reassurance. Further research is needed to co-produce solutions with service users and providers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesEnglandFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesAntenatal careCovid-19Healthcare providersHealth servicesInfluenzaMaternal vaccinationPertussisPregnancyPublic healthVaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID37480010
PMCPMC10362695
OpenAlexW4385064340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.