Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37479864›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Machine learning-based approaches for cancer prediction using microbiome data.

Pedro Freitas, Francisco Silva, Joana Vale Sousa, Rui M Ferreira, Céu Figueiredo, Tania Pereira, Hélder P Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Altered Bacteria Abundance Is Associated With Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro FreitasINESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal. pedro.g.freitas@inesctec.pt.
Francisco SilvaINESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
Joana Vale SousaINESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
Rui M FerreiraIpatimup - Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Céu FigueiredoIpatimup - Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Tania PereiraINESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
Hélder P OliveiraINESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTINESC TEC · PTi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence of the relationship between the microbiome composition and the development of numerous diseases, including cancer, has led to an increasing interest in the study of the human microbiome. Technological breakthroughs regarding DNA sequencing methods propelled microbiome studies with a large number of samples, which called for the necessity of more sophisticated data-analytical tools to analyze this complex relationship. The aim of this work was to develop a machine learning-based approach to distinguish the type of cancer based on the analysis of the tissue-specific microbial information, assessing the human microbiome as valuable predictive information for cancer identification. For this purpose, Random Forest algorithms were trained for the classification of five types of cancer-head and neck, esophageal, stomach, colon, and rectum cancers-with samples provided by The Cancer Microbiome Atlas database. One versus all and multi-class classification studies were conducted to evaluate the discriminative capability of the microbial data across increasing levels of cancer site specificity, with results showing a progressive rise in difficulty for accurate sample classification. Random Forest models achieved promising performances when predicting head and neck, stomach, and colon cancer cases, with the latter returning accuracy scores above 90% across the different studies conducted. However, there was also an increased difficulty when discriminating esophageal and rectum cancers, failing to differentiate with adequate results rectum from colon cancer cases, and esophageal from head and neck and stomach cancers. These results point to the fact that anatomically adjacent cancers can be more complex to identify due to microbial similarities. Despite the limitations, microbiome data analysis using machine learning may advance novel strategies to improve cancer detection and prevention, and decrease disease burden.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsMicrobiotaRectal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37479864
PMCPMC10362018
OpenAlexW4385064201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.