ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning-based approaches for cancer prediction using microbiome data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence at the gut-oral microbiota frontier: mapping machine learning tools for gastric cancer risk prediction.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Pooled it
- The role of gut microbiome in aging-associated diseases: where do we stand now and how technology will transform the future.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Review
- Machine learning integration of tissue-specific metagenomic signatures for colorectal cancer diagnosis.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence and machine learning for gut microbiome-based CRC screening.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Metagenomic profiling of the gut microbiome to predict orthopedic healing responses in postmenopausal women.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Identification of a weighted urinary microbial signature for bladder cancer discrimination.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Rumen Microbiota-Based Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Heat Stress and Identifying Associated Microbes.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Refining cancer prediction with DNA sequencing and combined machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MicroAIbiome: Decoding Cancer Types from Microbial Profiles Using Explainable Machine Learning.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Informatics at the Frontier of Cancer Research.Cancer research · 2025Review
- From lab to life: technological innovations in transforming cancer metastasis detection and therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Altered Bacteria Abundance Is Associated With Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- SEER-based machine learning prediction of bone metastasis in breast cancer: model development and validation.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiome Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Strategies, and Precision Oncology Perspectives.Cancers · 2025Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for detection of pancreatic cancer: a machine learning approach.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Tumour and microenvironment crosstalk in NSCLC progression and response to therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Recent advancements in artificial intelligence-powered cancer prediction from oral microbiome.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Review
- Deciphering microbial and metabolic influences in gastrointestinal diseases-unveiling their roles in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence of the relationship between the microbiome composition and the development of numerous diseases, including cancer, has led to an increasing interest in the study of the human microbiome. Technological breakthroughs regarding DNA sequencing methods propelled microbiome studies with a large number of samples, which called for the necessity of more sophisticated data-analytical tools to analyze this complex relationship. The aim of this work was to develop a machine learning-based approach to distinguish the type of cancer based on the analysis of the tissue-specific microbial information, assessing the human microbiome as valuable predictive information for cancer identification. For this purpose, Random Forest algorithms were trained for the classification of five types of cancer-head and neck, esophageal, stomach, colon, and rectum cancers-with samples provided by The Cancer Microbiome Atlas database. One versus all and multi-class classification studies were conducted to evaluate the discriminative capability of the microbial data across increasing levels of cancer site specificity, with results showing a progressive rise in difficulty for accurate sample classification. Random Forest models achieved promising performances when predicting head and neck, stomach, and colon cancer cases, with the latter returning accuracy scores above 90% across the different studies conducted. However, there was also an increased difficulty when discriminating esophageal and rectum cancers, failing to differentiate with adequate results rectum from colon cancer cases, and esophageal from head and neck and stomach cancers. These results point to the fact that anatomically adjacent cancers can be more complex to identify due to microbial similarities. Despite the limitations, microbiome data analysis using machine learning may advance novel strategies to improve cancer detection and prevention, and decrease disease burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.