ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Accuracy comparison of cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty using Hip Align and AR-Hip in the supine position.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmented reality-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the accuracy for cup positioning between portable inertial navigation systems and manual methods during total hip arthroplasty in the anterolateral supine position.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Comparison of accuracy between Navbit Sprint and AR-CT-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Use of augmented reality surgical navigation reduces intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging in anterior total hip arthroplasty with equivalent accuracy for component positioning.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Augmented reality navigation systems vs. conventional techniques in acetabular cup positioning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior Approach Reduces Postoperative Leg Length Differences by Preserving the Medial Iliofemoral Ligament.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Evaluation of cup placement accuracy in computer assisted total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Relating total hip replacement and acetabular cup positioning with outcome: A systematic review.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Retrospective study comparing the accuracies of handheld infrared stereo camera and augmented reality-based navigation systems for total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Accuracy of Acetabular Component Positioning Using a Mixed Reality-Guided Navigation System During Total Hip Arthroplasty.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of acetabular cup positioning between the accelerometer-based navigation system and the augmented reality-based navigation system during THA in the supine position. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 66 patients (70 hips) who underwent THA using two types of portable navigation system, Hip Align or AR-Hip, in the spine position. The absolute difference between the intraoperative navigation record and postoperative measurement using computed tomography data was evaluated. Preoperative clinical factors that decreased the accuracy of cup positioning by ≥ 3° were analyzed via multiple logistic regression analyses.
resultsThe average absolute error of inclination was 2.8 ± 2.6° in Hip Align and 2.7 ± 1.8° in AR-Hip, and absolute anteversion error was 2.5 ± 2.0° in Hip Align and 2.6 ± 2.2° in AR-Hip, and there was no significantly different between the two navigation systems. There was a significant association between the absolute measurement error (≥ 3°) of cup inclination and patients' BMI in the Hip Align group [odds ratio (OR) 1.350; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.035-1.760; p = 0.027], but not in the AR-Hip group.
conclusionsThe accuracy of the acetabular cup positioning between the Hip Align and AR-Hip showed no difference during THA in the spine position. The high BMI could have negative influence on the accuracy of cup positioning in THA using Hip Align, thus AR-Hip could be designable for obesity patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.