Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37479768›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2023

Prospective T1 mapping to assess gadolinium retention in brain after intrathecal gadobutrol.

Geir Ringstad, Lars Magnus Valnes, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Are Hugo Pripp, Per Kristian Eide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Different Glymphatic Kinetics in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Neurosurgery and the glymphatic system.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geir RingstadDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital- Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Magnus ValnesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Svein Are Sirirud VatneholThe Interventional Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Are Hugo PrippOslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Per Kristian EideDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. p.k.eide@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-9280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA possible pathway behind gadolinium retention in brain is leakage of contrast agents from blood to cerebrospinal fluid and entry into brain along perivascular (glymphatic) pathways. The object of this study was to assess for signs of gadolinium retention in brain 4 weeks after intrathecal contrast enhanced MRI.

methodsWe prospectively applied standardized T1 mapping of the brain before and 4 weeks after intrathecal administration of 0.5 mmol gadobutrol in patients under work-up of cerebrospinal fluid circulation disorders. Due to methodological limitations, a safety margin for percentage change in T1 time was set to 3%. Region-wise differences were assessed by pairwise comparison using t-tests and forest plots, and statistical significance was accepted at .05 level (two-tailed).

resultsIn a cohort of 76 participants (mean age 47.2 years ± 17.9 [standard deviation], 47 women), T1 relaxation times remained unchanged in cerebral cortex and basal ganglia 4 weeks after intrathecal gadobutrol. T1 was reduced from 1082 ± 46.7 ms to 1070.6 ± 36.5 ms (0.98 ±2.9%) (mean [standard deviation]) (p=0.001) in white matter, thus within the pre-defined 3% safety margin. The brain stem and cerebellum could not be assessed due to poor alignment of posterior fossa structures at scans from different time points.

conclusionGadolinium retention was not detected in the cerebral hemispheres 4 weeks after an intrathecal dose of 0.5 mmol gadobutrol, implying that presence of contrast agents in cerebrospinal fluid is of minor importance for gadolinium retention in brain.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaOrganometallic CompoundsBrainFemaleGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedProspective StudiesContrast MediagadobutrolGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAOrganometallic CompoundsCerebrospinal fluidGadobutrolGadolinium-based contrast agentsIntrathecalMagnetic resonance imagingRetention

Identifiers

PMID37479768
PMCPMC10425514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.