ArticleBone marrow transplantation2023
Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched related and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic neoplasm.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA for Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes After Matched Sibling Donor Versus Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based GVHD Prophylaxis.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Synergistic venetoclax and anti-CD3 therapy for control of alloreactive response in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Long-Term Remission Following Haploidentical HSCT for Therapy-Related Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia with Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Post-FCR Therapy for CLL: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Potential Impact of HLA DQB1*05 on Identical Sibling Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related Donor and Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients by Immune Profiles of Recipients and Donors.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Article
- Haploidentical and Matched Sibling Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Hospital-Based Study.Journal of hematology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplantation from haploidentical donors (haploHCT) has facilitated treatment of AML and MDS by increasing donor availability and became more feasible since the introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (ptCY). In our single-center retrospective analysis including 213 patients with AML or MDS, we compare the outcome of haploHCT (n = 40) with ptCY with HCT from HLA-identical MRD (n = 105) and MUD (n = 68). At 2 years after transplantation, overall survival (OS) after haploHCT was not significantly different (0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.79) compared to MRD (0.77; 0.67-0.88) and MUD transplantation (0.72; 0.64-0.82, p = 0.51). While progression-free survival (PFS) was also not significantly different (haploHCT: 0.60; 0.46-0.78, MRD: 0.55; 0.44-0.69, MUD: 0.64; 0.55-0.74, p = 0.64), non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly higher after haploHCT (0.18; 0.08-0.33) vs. MRD (0.029; 0.005-0.09) and MUD (0.06; 0.02-0.12, p < 0.05). Higher NRM was mainly caused by a higher rate of fatal infections, while deaths related to GvHD or other non-relapse reasons were rare in all groups. As most fatal infections occurred early and were bacterial related, one potential risk factor among many was identified in the significantly longer time to neutrophil engraftment after haploHCT with a median of 16 days (interquartile range; 14.8-20.0) vs. 12 days (10.0-13.0) for MRD and 11 days (10.0-13.0) for MUD (p = 0.01).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.