Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37479511›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Distinct socioeconomic profile of patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 and prepandemic respiratory infections in Brussels's deprived areas: a case-control study.

Judith Racape, Nicolas Dauby, Jean-Christophe Goffard, Kaoutar Abdellaoui, Cristina Radulescu, Yves Coppieters, Andrea Rea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith RacapeChair in Health and Precarity, Faculty of Medicine, Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium judith.racape@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1266-0191
Nicolas DaubyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Pierre, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Jean-Christophe GoffardDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hopital Erasme, Universite libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
Kaoutar AbdellaouiDepartment of Minimal Clinical Data, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Cristina RadulescuDepartment of Minimal Clinical Data, Hopital Erasme, Universite libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
Yves CoppietersResearch Center in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, School of Public Health, Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
Andrea ReaGroup for Research on Ethnic Relations, Migrations & Equality, Faculte de Philosophie et Sciences sociales, Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBelgium has been hit harder by COVID-19 than other countries in Europe. While clinical risk factors are well studied, socioeconomic risk factors remained underexplored. This study's objective was to analyse the social and clinical profile of patients hospitalised for COVID-19 during the two waves of 2020, compared with a control population in 2019 in two hospitals located in Brussels' most deprived area. DESIGN AND

methodsWe did a case-control study by using the minimal clinical data set in two Brussels hospitals. All patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in 2020, divided into two waves (n=3220), were compared with all patients hospitalised for viral pneumonia and respiratory diseases in 2019 (control population n=2950). Multinomial regression models were used to estimate the relative risk ratios of the association between the COVID-19 hospitalised populations (waves 1 and 2) and risk factors (social and clinical) stratified by age.

resultsPatients under 65 years of age and hospitalised for COVID-19 presented significantly higher rates (relative rate ratio (95% CI)), especially for the first wave, of obesity 1.6 (1.2-2.2), African nationalities 1.4 (1.0-1.8), lack of health insurance 1.6 (1.3-2.1), living in high-density population areas 1.6 (1.3-2.1) and low incomes 1.7 (1.4-2.1), compared with the control population For patients over 65 years of age, we did not observe significant excess of COVID-19 hospitalisations for any risk factors, except diabetes during for the second wave but we have a significant excess mortality rate than the control population for both waves (p<0.002).

conclusionsThe social and clinical profile of patients hospitalised for COVID-19 compared with a population hospitalised for viral respiratory diseases differed between age groups and waves. For younger patients, risk factors were linked to patients' precarious situations. This study underlines the role of selected social health determinants and the importance of routinely collecting social data, along with clinical data, particularly among vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pneumonia, ViralRespiratory Tract InfectionsCase-Control StudiesHumansRisk FactorsCOVID-19Health EquityPublic healthRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37479511
PMCPMC10364187
OpenAlexW4385064269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.