Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37479510›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Developing an in-depth understanding of patient and caregiver engagement across care transitions from hospital: protocol for a qualitative study exploring experiences in Canada.

Jacobi Elliott, Paula van Wyk, Roy Butler, Justine L Giosa, Joanie Sims Gould, Catherine E Tong, Mary Margaret Taabazuing, Helen Johnson, Paige Coyne, Fallon Mitchell and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Nurses' perspectives on caregiver engagement in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jacobi ElliottLawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada jacobi.elliott@sjhc.london.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8740-4638
Paula van WykKinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Roy ButlerSenior Leadership, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada.
Justine L GiosaSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2863-393X
Joanie Sims GouldUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-5405
Catherine E TongSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-0591
Mary Margaret TaabazuingDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Helen JohnsonFaculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paige CoyneKinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Fallon MitchellKinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra WhateSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Anne CallonPatient and Caregiver Partner, London, Ontario, Canada.
Judith CarsonPatient and Caregiver Partner, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Paul StoleeSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5685-0843

Funding

CIHR PJT-173265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient and caregiver engagement is critical, and often compromised, at points of transition between care settings, which are more common, and more challenging, for patients with complex medical problems. The consequences of poor care transitions are well-documented, both for patients and caregivers, and for the healthcare system. With an ageing population, there is greater need to focus on care transition experiences of older adults, who are often more medically complex, and more likely to require care from multiple providers across settings. The overall goal of this study is to understand what factors facilitate or hinder patient and caregiver engagement through transitions in care, and how these current engagement practices align with a previously developed engagement framework (CHOICE Framework). This study also aims to co-develop resources needed to support engagement and identify how these resources and materials should be implemented in practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses ethnographic approaches to explore the dynamics of patient and caregiver engagement, or lack thereof, during care transitions across three regions within Ontario. With the help of a front-line champion, patients (n=18-24), caregivers (n=18-24) and healthcare providers (n=36-54) are recruited from an acute care hospital unit (or similar) and followed through their care journey. Data are collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews. Workshops will be held to co-develop strategies and a plan for future implementation of resources and materials. Analysis of the data will use inductive and deductive coding techniques. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics clearance was obtained through the Western University Research Ethics Board, University of Windsor Research Ethics Board and the University of Waterloo Office of Research Ethics. The findings from this study are intended to contribute valuable evidence to further bridge the knowledge to practice gap in patient and caregiver engagement through care transitions. Findings will be disseminated through publications, conference presentations and reports.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient TransferAgedHospitalsHumansOntarioQualitative ResearchAged, 80 and overGERIATRIC MEDICINEHealth Services for the AgedQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37479510
PMCPMC10364181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.