Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37479483›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

IMPemBra: a phase 2 study comparing pembrolizumab with intermittent/short-term dual MAPK pathway inhibition plus pembrolizumab in patients with melanoma harboring the BRAFV600 mutation.

Elisa A Rozeman, Judith M Versluis, Karolina Sikorska, Esmée P Hoefsmit, Petros Dimitriadis, Disha Rao, Ruben Lacroix, Lindsay G Grijpink-Ongering, Marta Lopez-Yurda, Birthe C Heeres and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02625337 (Phase 2 Study Comparing Pembrolizumab With Intermittent/Short-term Dual MAPK Pathway Inhibition Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients Harboring the BRAFV600 Mutation), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02625337 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Phase 2 Study Comparing Pembrolizumab With Intermittent/Short-term Dual MAPK Pathway Inhibition Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients Harboring the BRAFV600 Mutation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2016 to 2018Enrolled32ConditionsMetastatic MelanomaArmsPembrolizumab, Dabrafenib, Trametinib, Biopsy, Blood taking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Novel Targets for the Treatment of Melanoma.Current oncology reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa A RozemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7063-651X
Judith M VersluisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karolina SikorskaDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Esmée P HoefsmitDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3989-8175
Petros DimitriadisDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Disha RaoDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruben LacroixDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lindsay G Grijpink-OngeringDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marta Lopez-YurdaDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Birthe C HeeresDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart A van de WielDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudie FlohilDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aysegul SariDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn W T P J HeijminkDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daan van den BroekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annegien BroeksCore Facility and Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem B de GrootIsala Oncology Center, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Marieke A VolleberghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sofie WilgenhofDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes V van ThienenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John B A G HaanenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-7704
Christian U BlankDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands c.blank@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLIsala · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous combination of MAPK pathway inhibition (MAPKi) and anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) showed high response rates, but only limited improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) at the cost of a high frequency of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) in patients with BRAF

methodsPatients with treatment-naïve BRAF

resultsBetween June 2016 and August 2018, 33 patients with advanced melanoma have been included and 32 were randomized. Grade 3-4 TRAE were observed in 12%, 12%, 50%, and 63% of patients in cohort 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. All planned targeted therapy was given in 88%, 63%, and 38% of patients in cohort 2, 3, and 4. ORR at week 6, 12, and 18 were 38%, 63%, and 63% in cohort 1; 25%, 63%, and 75% in cohort 2; 25%, 50%, and 75% in cohort 3; and 0%, 63%, and 50% in cohort 4. After a median follow-up of 43.5 months, median PFS was 10.6 months for pembrolizumab monotherapy and not reached for patients treated with pembrolizumab and intermittent dabrafenib and trametinib (p=0.17). The 2-year and 3-year landmark PFS were both 25% for cohort 1, both 63% for cohort 2, 50% and 38% for cohort 3 and 75% and 60% for cohort 4.

conclusionsThe combination of pembrolizumab plus intermittent dabrafenib and trametinib seems more feasible and tolerable than continuous triple therapy. The efficacy is promising and appears to be favorable over pembrolizumab monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02625337.

Indexed as

MelanomaProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedMutationOximesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddabrafenibImidazolesOximespembrolizumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID37479483
PMCPMC10364170
OpenAlexW4385064007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.