Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37478864›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023

A conserved pressure-driven mechanism for regulating cytosolic osmolarity.

Katrina B Velle, Rikki M Garner, Tatihana K Beckford, Makaela Weeda, Chunzi Liu, Andrew S Kennard, Marc Edwards, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A role for theMolecular biology of the cell · 2026
    Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katrina B VelleDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Rikki M GarnerDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Tatihana K BeckfordDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Makaela WeedaDepartment of Biology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
Chunzi LiuDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Andrew S KennardDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Marc EdwardsDepartment of Biology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
Lillian K Fritz-LaylinDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: lfritzlaylin@umass.edu.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USAmherst College · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Chytrid fungi and the functional specification of actin networksR35GM143039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FRITZ-LAYLIN, LILLIAN KATHLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Investigating the regulation of PI(3,4)P2 in migrating cellsR15GM143733 · NIGMS · AMHERST COLLEGE · PI EDWARDS, MARC · 2021 to 2022
$511k
Defining cytoskeletal mechanisms driving cell motility in NaegleriaK99GM147656 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI VELLE, KATRINA · 2022 to 2023
$146k
Defining mechanisms of mitotic spindle organization in NaegleriaF32GM148023 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI KENNARD, ANDREW STEVEN · 2022 to 2024
$141k
Defining actin-based mechanisms driving basic cell functions and pathogenic behaviors in NaegleriaF32AI150057 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI VELLE, KATRINA · 2020 to 2021
$135k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI150057NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM148023NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM147656NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM143733NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling intracellular osmolarity is essential to all cellular life. Cells that live in hypo-osmotic environments, such as freshwater, must constantly battle water influx to avoid swelling until they burst. Many eukaryotic cells use contractile vacuoles to collect excess water from the cytosol and pump it out of the cell. Although contractile vacuoles are essential to many species, including important pathogens, the mechanisms that control their dynamics remain unclear. To identify the basic principles governing contractile vacuole function, we investigate here the molecular mechanisms of two species with distinct vacuolar morphologies from different eukaryotic lineages: the discoban Naegleria gruberi and the amoebozoan slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Using quantitative cell biology, we find that although these species respond differently to osmotic challenges, they both use vacuolar-type proton pumps for filling contractile vacuoles and actin for osmoregulation, but not to power water expulsion. We also use analytical modeling to show that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive water out of contractile vacuoles in these species, similar to findings from the alveolate Paramecium multimicronucleatum. These analyses show that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive contractile vacuole emptying for a wide range of cellular pressures and vacuolar geometries. Because vacuolar-type proton-pump-dependent contractile vacuole filling and pressure-dependent emptying have now been validated in three eukaryotic lineages that diverged well over a billion years ago, we propose that this represents an ancient eukaryotic mechanism of osmoregulation.

Indexed as

DictyosteliumCytosolEukaryotaOsmolar ConcentrationVacuolesWaterWater-Electrolyte BalanceWateractincontractile vacuolecytoskeletonDictyosteliumevolutionary cell biologyNaegleriaosmoregulationosmotic pressure

Identifiers

PMID37478864
PMCPMC10529079
OpenAlexW4384938571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.