ArticleStem cell reports2023
Platform-agnostic CellNet enables cross-study analysis of cell fate engineering protocols.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic developmental engineering of human liver organogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Computational blueprints for cell fate programming.Stem cell reports · 2026Review
- Human plasma-like medium enhances structural and metabolic maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Directing stem cell differentiation by chromatin state approximation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Notch signaling activation reduces vesicular endocytosis in human pluripotent stem cell-derived CNS-like endothelial cells.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Early multi-omic signatures and machine learning models predict cardiomyocyte differentiation efficiency and enable robust hPSC differentiation to cardiomyocytes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Elimination of CDX2 restricts intestinal hybrid differentiation signatures in stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Integrated multi-omics analysis identifies features that predict human pluripotent stem cell-derived progenitor differentiation to cardiomyocytes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Article
- Misidentification of neural cell identity in liver-derived organoid systems.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimization of cell engineering protocols requires standard, comprehensive quality metrics. We previously developed CellNet, a computational tool to quantitatively assess the transcriptional fidelity of engineered cells compared with their natural counterparts, based on bulk-derived expression profiles. However, this platform and others were limited in their ability to compare data from different sources, and no current tool makes it easy to compare new protocols with existing state-of-the-art protocols in a standardized manner. Here, we utilized our prior application of the top-scoring pair transformation to build a computational platform, platform-agnostic CellNet (PACNet), to address both shortcomings. To demonstrate the utility of PACNet, we applied it to thousands of samples from over 100 studies that describe dozens of protocols designed to produce seven distinct cell types. We performed an in-depth examination of hepatocyte and cardiomyocyte protocols to identify the best-performing methods, characterize the extent of intra-protocol and inter-lab variation, and identify common off-target signatures, including a surprising neural/neuroendocrine signature in primary liver-derived organoids. We have made PACNet available as an easy-to-use web application, allowing users to assess their protocols relative to our database of reference engineered samples, and as open-source, extensible code.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.