ArticleLaboratory medicine2024
Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to measure heteroplasmic m.3243A>G mitochondrial mutations.
Article in Laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDifferent mitochondrial DNA genotypes can coexist in a cell population as well as in a single cell, a condition known as heteroplasmy. Here, we accurately determined the heteroplasmy levels of the m.3243A>G mutation, which is the most frequently identified mutation in patients with mitochondrial diseases, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR).
methodsThe m.3243A>G heteroplasmy levels in artificial heteroplasmy controls mixed with various proportions of wild-type and mutant plasmids were measured using ddPCR, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and Sanger sequencing. The m.3243A>G heteroplasmy levels in DNA, extracted from the peripheral blood of patients with suspected mitochondrial disease and healthy subjects, were determined using ddPCR.
resultsThe accuracy of the ddPCR method was high. The lower limit of detection was 0.1%, which indicated its higher sensitivity compared with other methods. The m.3243A>G heteroplasmy levels in peripheral blood, measured using ddPCR, correlated inversely with age at the time of analysis. The m.3243A>G mutation may be overlooked in the peripheral blood-derived DNA of elderly people, as patients >60 years of age have heteroplasmy levels <10%, which is difficult to detect using methods other than the highly sensitive ddPCR.
conclusionddPCR may be considered an accurate and sensitive method for measuring m.3243 A>G heteroplasmy levels of mitochondrial DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.