Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37478323›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2023

Assessment of Meal Anticipation for Improving Fully Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Jose Garcia-Tirado, Patricio Colmegna, Orianne Villard, Jenny L Diaz, Rebeca Esquivel-Zuniga, Chaitanya L K Koravi, Charlotte L Barnett, Mary C Oliveri, Morgan Fuller, Sue A Brown and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04877730 (Diabetes Closed-Loop Project 6), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04877730 nacompletednot on this map

Diabetes Closed-Loop Project 6 (DCLP6): Fully Automated Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes Using Meal Anticipation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsFully Closed Loop (FCL), Fully Closed Loop with meal anticipation module (FCL+), Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Future of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Metabolic Models, in Silico Trials, and Algorithms.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Metabolic Models, in Silico Trials, and Algorithms.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Dosing Algorithms for Insulin Pumps.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Automated Insulin Delivery for Type 1 Diabetes: Present and Future.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jose Garcia-TiradoCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Patricio ColmegnaCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Orianne VillardCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-1425
Jenny L DiazCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Rebeca Esquivel-ZunigaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Chaitanya L K KoraviCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Charlotte L BarnettCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Mary C OliveriCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Morgan FullerCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Sue A BrownCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Mark D DeBoerCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Marc D BretonCenter for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-2693

Funding

Advanced Artificial Pancreas Systems to Enable Fully Automated Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes MellitusR01DK129553 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BRETON, MARC D, BROWN, SUE A · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK129553NIH HHS R01DK129553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMeals are a consistent challenge to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our objective was to assess the glycemic impact of meal anticipation within a fully automated insulin delivery (AID) system among adults with T1D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe report the results of a randomized crossover clinical trial comparing three modalities of AID systems: hybrid closed loop (HCL), full closed loop (FCL), and full closed loop with meal anticipation (FCL+). Modalities were tested during three supervised 24-h admissions, where breakfast, lunch, and dinner were consumed per participant's home schedule, at a fixed time, and with a 1.5-h delay, respectively. Primary outcome was the percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) during the breakfast postprandial period for FCL+ versus FCL.

resultsThirty-five adults with T1D (age 44.5 ± 15.4 years; HbA1c 6.7 ± 0.9%; n = 23 women and n = 12 men) were randomly assigned. TIR for the 5-h period after breakfast was 75 ± 23%, 58 ± 21%, and 63 ± 19% for HCL, FCL, and FCL+, respectively, with no significant difference between FCL+ and FCL. For the 2 h before dinner, time below range (TBR) was similar for FCL and FCL+. For the 5-h period after dinner, TIR was similar for FCL+ and FCL (71 ± 34% vs. 72 ± 29%; P = 1.0), whereas TBR was reduced in FCL+ (median 0% [0-0%] vs. 0% [0-0.8%]; P = 0.03). Overall, 24-h control for HCL, FCL, and FCL+ was 86 ± 10%, 77 ± 11%, and 77 ± 12%, respectively.

conclusionsAlthough postprandial control remained optimal with hybrid AID, both fully AID solutions offered overall TIR >70% with similar or lower exposure to hypoglycemia. Anticipation did not significantly improve postprandial control in AID systems but also did not increase hypoglycemic risk when meals were delayed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1InsulinAdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Infusion SystemsInsulin, Regular, HumanMaleMealsMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin, Regular, Human

Identifiers

PMID37478323
PMCPMC10465820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.