ArticlePloS one2023
Prediction of lymphoma response to CAR T cells by deep learning-based image analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning in paediatric haematological malignancies: a systematic review of prognosis, toxicity and treatment response models.Pediatric research · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- 2026 Update on the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles-enhanced CAR-T cell therapy: current advances and future directions.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Process Systems Engineering in Precision Medicine: Opportunities in Autologous CAR-T Therapy.Engineering in life sciences · 2026Review
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease exacerbates hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: an explainable machine learning approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Enhancing lymphoma cancer detection using deep transfer learning on histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Survival Prediction in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Using Pre- and Post-Transplant Factors and Computational Intelligence.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Reproducibility ofCurrent cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Prediction of Radiation Therapy Induced Cardiovascular Toxicity from Pretreatment CT Images in Patients with Thoracic Malignancy via an Optimal Biomarker Approach.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- Smart CAR-T Nanosymbionts: archetypes and proto-models.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Review
- Advances in manufacturing chimeric antigen receptor immune cell therapies.Seminars in immunopathology · 2024Review
- Applications of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma B Cells.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The Art of Bioimmunogenomics (BIGs) 5.0 in CAR-T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma Management.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Review
- New regulatory thinking is needed for AI-based personalised drug and cell therapies in precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Review
- PET/CT in the Evaluation of CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in Hematological Malignancies.Molecular imagingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical prognostic scoring systems have limited utility for predicting treatment outcomes in lymphomas. We therefore tested the feasibility of a deep-learning (DL)-based image analysis methodology on pre-treatment diagnostic computed tomography (dCT), low-dose CT (lCT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images and rule-based reasoning to predict treatment response to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell lymphomas. Pre-treatment images of 770 lymph node lesions from 39 adult patients with B-cell lymphomas treated with CD19-directed CAR T-cells were analyzed. Transfer learning using a pre-trained neural network model, then retrained for a specific task, was used to predict lesion-level treatment responses from separate dCT, lCT, and FDG-PET images. Patient-level response analysis was performed by applying rule-based reasoning to lesion-level prediction results. Patient-level response prediction was also compared to prediction based on the international prognostic index (IPI) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The average accuracy of lesion-level response prediction based on single whole dCT slice-based input was 0.82+0.05 with sensitivity 0.87+0.07, specificity 0.77+0.12, and AUC 0.91+0.03. Patient-level response prediction from dCT, using the "Majority 60%" rule, had accuracy 0.81, sensitivity 0.75, and specificity 0.88 using 12-month post-treatment patient response as the reference standard and outperformed response prediction based on IPI risk factors (accuracy 0.54, sensitivity 0.38, and specificity 0.61 (p = 0.046)). Prediction of treatment outcome in B-cell lymphomas from pre-treatment medical images using DL-based image analysis and rule-based reasoning is feasible. This approach can potentially provide clinically useful prognostic information for decision-making in advance of initiating CAR T-cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.