Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37478058›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The experience of being a caregiver of patients with digestive cancer, from patients and caregivers' perception: A mixed study.

Charlotte Grivel, Pierre Nizet, Manon Martin, Solange Pécout, Aurélie Lepeintre, Yann Touchefeu, Sonia Prot-Labarthe, Adrien Evin, Jean-François Huon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is intrapersonal emotional competence a personal resource for the quality of life of informal caregivers of cancer patients unlike interpersonal emotional competence?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte GrivelNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-6778
Pierre NizetNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Manon MartinNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Solange PécoutInstitut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Oncologie Digestive, Nantes, France.
Aurélie LepeintreNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de soins Palliatifs et de Support, Nantes, France.
Yann TouchefeuInstitut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Oncologie Digestive, Nantes, France.
Sonia Prot-LabartheNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Adrien EvinNantes Université, University Tours, CHU Nantes, CHU Tours, INSERM, MethodS in Patients-Centered Outcomes and HEalth Research, SPHERE, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5720-1597
Jean-François HuonNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-4419
Nantes Université · FRUniversité de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsCaregivers are essential in the care of a patient with digestive cancer. Considering their experience and needs is crucial.

objectivesTo explore the experience of caregivers of patients with digestive cancer and to compare the perspectives of patients and caregivers.

methodsA mixed-methods study with a cross-sectional prospective and a comprehensive qualitative dimension was performed in a medical oncology unit in a French tertiary hospital. Dyads made of patients with digestive cancer and their caregiver were recruited. The Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers (SCNS-PC) questionnaires were distributed to caregivers. The CRA was used to measure the caregiver burden and the SCNS-PC was used to identify the unmet supportive care needs of caregivers. Semi-structured interviews with the dyads were conducted. Qualitative interviews addressed various dimensions of the caregiver's experience from each dyad's member perspective.

resultsThirty-two caregivers completed the questionnaires. Responses showed high self-esteem, schedule burden, and a need for care and information services. Ten dyads participated in the interviews. Three themes emerged from the caregiver's interviews: illness is an upheaval; loneliness and helplessness are experienced; caring is a natural role with positive outcomes. Four themes emerged from patient's interviews: the caregiver naturally assumes the role and gets closer; he is the patient's anchor; his life is disrupted; anxiety and guilt accompany the desire to protect him. In comparing patient and caregiver data, the main theme of disagreement was their relationship.

conclusionsCaregiver care does not appear to be optimal, particularly in terms of their need for information. Patients have a fairly good representation of their experience, but the caregivers' opinion need to be considered.

Indexed as

CaregiversGastrointestinal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePerceptionProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37478058
PMCPMC10361535
OpenAlexW4385064341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.