Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477985›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2023

Fragment Ion Abundance Reveals Information about Structure and Charge Localization in Highly Charged Proteins.

Thomas A Shoff, Ryan R Julian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas A ShoffDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.
Ryan R JulianDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-8355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Top-down mass spectrometry (MS) is a versatile tool that has been employed to investigate both protein sequence and structure. Although a variety of different fragmentation methods are available in top-down MS that can potentially yield structural information, quantifying differences between spectra remains challenging. Herein, we show that subtle differences in spectra produced by a variety of fragmentation methods are surprisingly sensitive to protein structure and/or charge localization, even in highly unfolded proteins observed in high charge states. In addition to exposing information about the protein structure, differences in fragmentation also reveal insight into the mechanisms underlying the dissociation methods themselves. The results further reveal that small changes in experimental parameters (such as the addition of methanol instead of acetonitrile) lead to changes in structure that are reflected in statistically reproducible differences in dissociation. Collisional annealing of structurally dissimilar ions in the gas phase eventually leads to dissociation spectra that are indistinguishable, suggesting that structural differences can be erased by sufficient thermal activation. Additional experiments illustrate that identical charge states of the same protein can be distinguished if those produced directly by electrospray are compared to ions manipulated by

Indexed as

ProteinsProtonsAmino Acid SequenceIonsMass SpectrometryIonsProteinsProtonscharge localizationcollisional activationelectron-transfer dissociationnative mass spectrometrytop-down mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID37477985
PMCPMC10401701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.