Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477930›Full record

ReviewInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Clinical Applications of Machine Learning in the Management of Intraocular Cancers: A Narrative Review.

Anirudha S Chandrabhatla, Taylor M Horgan, Caroline C Cotton, Naveen K Ambati, Yevgeniy Eugene Shildkrot

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anirudha S ChandrabhatlaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Taylor M HorganDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Caroline C CottonDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Naveen K AmbatiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Yevgeniy Eugene ShildkrotDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There is great promise in use of machine learning (ML) for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various medical conditions in ophthalmology and beyond. Applications of ML for ocular neoplasms are in early development and this review synthesizes the current state of ML in ocular oncology. Methods: We queried PubMed and Web of Science and evaluated 804 publications, excluding nonhuman studies. Metrics on ML algorithm performance were collected and the Prediction model study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool was used to evaluate bias. We report the results of 63 unique studies. Results: Research regarding ML applications to intraocular cancers has leveraged multiple algorithms and data sources. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were one of the most commonly used ML algorithms and most work has focused on uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma. The majority of ML models discussed here were developed for diagnosis and prognosis. Algorithms for diagnosis primarily leveraged imaging (e.g., optical coherence tomography) as inputs, whereas those for prognosis leveraged combinations of gene expression, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics. Conclusions: ML has the potential to improve the management of intraocular cancers. Published ML models perform well, but were occasionally limited by small sample sizes owing to the low prevalence of intraocular cancers. This could be overcome with synthetic data enhancement and low-shot ML techniques. CNNs can be integrated into existing diagnostic workflows, while non-neural networks perform well in determining prognosis.

Indexed as

MelanomaRetinal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37477930
PMCPMC10365137
OpenAlexW4384922981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.