ArticlePituitary2023
The efficacy of a visiting surgical service versus that of a hospital-based surgical service in providing endoscopic endonasal surgery to remove nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in rural communities.
Article in Pituitary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative management of craniopharyngioma resection through endoscopic endonasal approach in a super-super obese patient: A technical case report.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo satisfy the increasing demand for endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to treat pituitary tumors, especially in rural areas, the "mobile EEA" system, a visiting surgical service, has been established We report this unique system for maintaining community healthcare and evaluate the surgical results of mobile EEA.
methodsA retrospectively acquired database of 225 consecutive cases of EEA at Shinshu University Hospital (i.e., "home EEA") and its affiliated hospitals (i.e., "away EEA") between May 2018 and May 2022 was reviewed. A total of 105 consecutive patients who fulfilled the criterion of a diagnosis of new-onset nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (PA) were included. Clinical characteristics and postoperative clinical outcomes were statistically compared between the home EEA and away EEA groups to assess the presence of a home advantage and/or an away disadvantage.
resultsPatients were stratified into two cohorts: patients treated at our hospital (home EEA: n = 41 [39.0%]) and those treated in the visiting surgical service at an affiliated hospital (away EEA: n = 64 [61.0%]). Postoperative clinical outcomes, such as the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.39), operation time (p = 0.80), visual function (p = 0.54), and occurrence of surgical complications (p = 0.53), were comparable between the groups. There were no visiting surgical service-related adverse events or accidents caused by physicians' driving to away hospitals.
conclusionPituitary surgeries performed via the mobile EEA system for nonfunctioning PAs may help maintain local community healthcare. Furthermore, this system can also contribute to the efficient training of surgeons by the same experienced pituitary surgeon using the same protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.