Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477783›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2023

Multiple Myeloma: Current Clinical Landscape and Compounding Costs.

Kelsey Beck, Tyler Sandahl, Sikander Ailawadhi, Nandita Khera, Chelsee Jensen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey BeckMayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Tyler SandahlMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sikander AilawadhiMayo Clinic Florida Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Nandita KheraMayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Chelsee JensenMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA. jensen.chelsee@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-4414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved resulting in MM becoming a chronic condition. The costs of MM therapies are substantial and compound as patients remain on long-term maintenance therapies and progress through multiple lines of high-cost therapies. MM predominantly impacts the elderly population insured by Medicare; here, we analyze how these costs impact patients and the Medicare trust fund. RECENT

findingsWith the recent passing of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), we postulate how costs may be impacted and debate future policy initiatives that may result in sustainability. The IRA will impact drug pricing and likely reduce the costs of some treatments used in MM; there is still a lot of room for policy reform to reduce financial toxicity to patients and prevent depletion of the Medicare trust fund.

Indexed as

MedicareMultiple MyelomaAgedForecastingHealth Care CostsHumansUnited StatesFinancial toxicityInflation Reduction ActMedicareMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.