ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2023
Head-to-head comparisons of
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Diagnostic Accuracy of Current Modalities for Local Tumor Staging.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Prostate‑specific membrane antigen: Molecular functions and emerging roles as a therapeutic target (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Article
- Comparison of PERCIST5, imPERCIST5, and PERCIMT Criteria for Early Assessment of Pembrolizumab Response with FDG-PET/CT in Metastatic Bladder Cancer Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Applications beyond Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Other Radiopharmaceuticals.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo prospectively compare the uptake of
methodsClinicopathologic and imaging data were collected from 10 UTUC patients who underwent preoperative
resultsTen UTUC patients with 12 malignant lesions and another 10 ccRCC patients were included.
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.