Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477738›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Functional and anatomical outcomes of fovea on, fovea off and fovea-splitting rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Dana Barequet, Rachel Shemesh, Dana Zvi, Ram Cohen, Omer Trivizki, Shulamit Schwartz, Adiel Barak, Anat Loewenstein, Gilad Rabina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current Topics in OCT Applications in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dana BarequetDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel. danabarequet@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8879-5378
Rachel ShemeshSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Dana ZviDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ram CohenDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Omer TrivizkiDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shulamit SchwartzDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adiel BarakDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Anat LoewensteinDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gilad RabinaDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of fovea-on, fovea-off, and fovea-split rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

methodsRetrospective case series of consecutive patients diagnosed with RRD and treated with only pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Preoperative and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functional outcomes were obtained prior to and 6 months after surgery. RRD extending to the edge of the fovea on OCT was termed fovea-split RRD.

resultsA total of 152 eyes were included, out of which 89 eyes presented with a fovea-off, 36 with a fovea-on, and 27 with a fovea-split RRD. The mean visual acuity (VA) preoperatively was 1.32 ± 0.58 logMAR (20/400 equivalent on Snellen chart), 0.19 ± 0.20 (20/30), and 0.71 ± 0.56 (20/100) for the fovea-off, fovea-on, and fovea-split groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean VA at 6 months of follow-up significantly improved for the fovea-split and fovea-off groups to 0.54 ± 0.79 (20/70) (p < 0.001) and 0.45 ± 0.29 (20/50) (p = 0.01), respectively, and remained stable for the fovea-on group 0.24 ± 0.20 (20/30) (p = 0.25). Differences in alterations of the outer retinal layers (p < 0.001) and in the in-segment/outer-segment ratio (p < 0.001) were found between the groups.

conclusionEyes with fovea-split RRD had both a preoperative and a final postoperative VA between those of fovea-on and fovea-off eyes and different anatomical changes on OCT. This new entity warrants different patient expectations for postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Fovea CentralisRetinal DetachmentTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyAdultAgedEndotamponadeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFovea-splitOptical coherence tomographyPars plana vitrectomyRhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.