ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Evaluation of fracture behavior in short fiber-reinforced direct and indirect overlay restorations.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of different CAD/CAM materials and thickness on the immediate load-bearing capacity of occlusal veneers.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Fracture load and three-dimensional internal void analysis of direct composites used to restore worn molars.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with different bi-layered core and occlusal overlay materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Post-and-Core Buildup Techniques with Short Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Polyethylene Fiber: In Vitro Evaluation of the Fracture Load and Mode of Failure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Hardness and mass changes from acidic challenges to CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced resin composites.Odontology · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Performance of Polyethylene Fibers and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorations: A Scoping Review.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Effect of combined use of reinforcement materials on the fracture resistance of MOD cavity restorations in endodontically treated teeth.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Two different short fiber-reinforced resin composites for extensive MOD cavities in premolars and molars.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparativeJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Bacterial adhesion and surface roughness of particulate-filled and short fiber-reinforced composites.Odontology · 2025Article
- Fracture resistance of endocrowns made from different CAD/CAM materials after prolonged fatigue aging.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Assessment of biomimetic materials in strengthening root canal-treated teeth during orthodontic intrusion or extrusion.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Fracture Resistance of Direct versus Indirect Restorations on Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim was to assess how incorporating a short-fiber composite (SFC) core would affect the fracture behavior of direct and indirect overlays. Furthermore, to examine the relationship between the thickness ratio of SFC core to particulate-filled composite (PFC) veneering and the fracture-behavior of bilayered-structured restorations. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 120 molars were used to create MOD cavities, with palatal cusps removed. Four different groups of direct overlays were then made (n = 15/group), all of which featured a SFC core (everX Flow) with varying thicknesses (0, 1, 4, and 5 mm), as well as a surface layer of PFC (G-aenial Posterior), with the overall thickness of the bilayered-structured restoration set at 5 mm. Additionally, four groups of CAD/CAM restorations were created (Cerasmart 270 and Initial LiSi Block), with or without 2 mm of SFC core reinforcement. Following the fabrication of these restorations, cyclic fatigue aging was carried out for a total of 500,000 cycles, with an applied maximum load (F
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) observed in the fracture resistance of indirect overlays reinforced with a 2-mm SFC core compared to those made solely from restorative materials. Direct overlays constructed using plain SFC or with a 4-mm layer thickness of SFC core exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance values (2674 ± 465 and 2537 ± 561 N) (p < 0.05) when compared to all other groups tested, according to the statistical analysis ANOVA.
conclusionsThe most effective method for restoring large MOD cavities was found to be direct restoration using SFC either alone or as a bulk core in combination with PFC composite. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of SFC as bulk reinforcing base will significantly improve the loading performance of directly layered restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.