Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477652›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of brain metastasis associated with a less invasive growth pattern, higher T-cell infiltration and raised tumor ADC on diffusion weighted MRI.

Rasheed Zakaria, Michael D Jenkinson, Mark Radon, Kumar Das, Harish Poptani, Nitika Rathi, Philip S Rudland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rasheed ZakariaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Nuffield Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK. rzakaria@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-2662
Michael D JenkinsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mark RadonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Kumar DasDepartment of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Harish PoptaniDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Nuffield Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
Nitika RathiDepartment of Neuropathology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Philip S RudlandDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Nuffield Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28190Medical Research Council MR/L017342/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors with an increasing incidence. They are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with solid organ cancer and a focus of recent clinical research and experimental interest. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being increasingly used to treat solid organ cancers.

methodsTo determine whether immune checkpoint inhibitors were biologically effective in the brain, we compared melanoma brain metastasis samples where treatment with ipilimumab had occurred preoperatively to those who had not received any immune modulating therapy and looked for histopathological (invasion, vascularity, metastasis inducing proteins, matrix metalloproteinases, immune cell infiltration, tissue architecture) and advanced MRI differences (diffusion weighted imaging).

resultsCo-localized tissue samples from the same regions as MRI regions of interest showed significantly lower vascularity (density of CD34 + vessels) in the core and higher T-cell infiltration (CD3 + cells) in the leading edge for ipilimumab-treated brain metastasis samples than for untreated cases and this correlated with a higher tumor ADC signal at post-treatment/preoperative MRI brain.

conclusionsTreatment of a melanoma brain metastasis with ipilimumab appears to cause measurable biological changes in the tumor that can be correlated with post-treatment diffusion weighted MRI imaging, suggesting both a mechanism of action and a possible surrogate marker of efficacy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMelanomaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabT-LymphocytesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabADCBrain metastasisDWIImmunotherapyMalignant melanomaMRI

Identifiers

PMID37477652
PMCPMC10491542
OpenAlexW4384924632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.