Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477577›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2023

A Bayesian statistics tutorial for clinical research: Prior distributions and meaningful results for small clinical samples.

Caroline Larson, David Kaplan, Teresa Girolamo, Sara T Kover, Inge-Marie Eigsti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline LarsonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7940-2528
David KaplanDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Teresa GirolamoSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Sara T KoverDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Inge-Marie EigstiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Optimal Outcomes in ASD: Adult Functioning, Predictors, and MechanismsR01MH112687 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI EIGSTI, INGE-MARIE, FEIN, DEBORAH A. · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
TRAINING RESEARCHERS IN LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENTST32DC000052 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI RICE, MABEL L · 1995 to 2022
$2.7M
Training in the Cognitive Neuroscience of CommunicationT32DC017703 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Inge-Marie Eigsti, Emily B Myers · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000052NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC017703NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBayesian statistics provides an effective, reliable approach for research with small clinical samples and yields clinically meaningful results that can bridge research and practice. This tutorial demonstrates how Bayesian statistics can be effectively and reliably implemented with a small, heterogeneous participant sample to promote reproducible and clinically relevant research. METHODS/

resultsWe tested example research questions pertaining to language and clinical features in autism spectrum disorder (ASD; n = 20), a condition characterized by significant heterogeneity. We provide step-by-step instructions and visualizations detailing how to (1) identify and develop prior distributions from the literature base, (2) evaluate model convergence and reliability, and (3) compare models with different prior distributions to select the best performing model. Moreover, in step three, we demonstrate how to determine whether a sample size is sufficient for reliably interpreting model results. We also provide instructions detailing how to examine results with varied bounds of clinical interest, such as the probability that an effect will reflect at least one standard deviation change in scores on a standardized assessment. This information facilitates generalization and application of Bayesian results to a variety of clinical research questions and settings.

conclusionThe tutorial concludes with suggestions for future clinical research, ensuring the utility of our step-by-step instructions for a broad clinical audience.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderBayes TheoremBiomedical ResearchData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalResearch DesignSample Sizeautism spectrum disorderbayesian statisticsclinical researchreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID37477577
PMCPMC10591806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.