Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477290›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Fluid extraction from the left-right organizer uncovers mechanical properties needed for symmetry breaking.

Pedro Sampaio, Sara Pestana, Catarina Bota, Adán Guerrero, Ivo A Telley, David Smith, Susana Santos Lopes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Science advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Dynamic forces drive cell and organ morphology changes during embryonic development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pedro Sampaio *CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School. Faculdade de8 Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Sara Pestana *CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School. Faculdade de8 Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Catarina BotaCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School. Faculdade de8 Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Adán GuerreroLaboratorio Nacional de Microscopía Avanzada. Departamento de Genética del Desarrollo y Fisiología Molecular. Instituto de Biotecnología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Ivo A TelleyInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4444-1046
David SmithSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Susana Santos LopesCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School. Faculdade de8 Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6733-6356
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PTCalouste Gulbenkian Foundation · PTUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other vertebrates define body axis left-right asymmetry in the early stages of embryo development. The mechanism behind left-right establishment is not fully understood. Symmetry breaking occurs in a dedicated organ called the left-right organizer (LRO) and involves motile cilia generating fluid-flow therein. However, it has been a matter of debate whether the process of symmetry breaking relies on a chemosensory or a mechanosensory mechanism (Shinohara et al., 2012). Novel tailored manipulations for LRO fluid extraction in living zebrafish embryos allowed us to pinpoint a physiological developmental period for breaking left-right symmetry during development. The shortest critical time-window was narrowed to one hour and characterized by a mild counterclockwise flow. The experimental challenge consisted in emptying the LRO of its fluid, abrogating simultaneously flow force and chemical determinants. Our findings revealed an unprecedented recovery capacity of the embryo to re-fil and re-circulate new LRO fluid. The embryos that later developed laterality problems were found to be those that had lower anterior angular velocity and thus less anterior-posterior heterogeneity. Next, aiming to test the presence of any secreted determinant, we replaced the extracted LRO fluid by a physiological buffer. Despite some transitory flow homogenization, laterality defects were absent unless viscosity was altered, demonstrating that symmetry breaking does not depend on the nature of the fluid content but is rather sensitive to fluid mechanics. Altogether, we conclude that the zebrafish LRO is more sensitive to fluid dynamics for symmetry breaking.

Indexed as

ZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsAnimalsBody PatterningCiliaEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianHumansHydrodynamicsZebrafish Proteinschemosensory hypothesisfluid flowKupffer's vesicleleft-rightmechanosensory hypothesismotile ciliaphysics of living systemszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID37477290
PMCPMC10361723
OpenAlexW4384922358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.