Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477106›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2024

Olaparib plus bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer by molecular status: an updated PAOLA-1 based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Youwen Zhu, Qiuping Yang, Kun Liu, Hui Cao, Hong Zhu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02477644 (Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial Olaparib vs. Placebo Patients With Advanced FIGO Stage IIIB-IV High Grade Serious or Endometrioid Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer Treated Standard First-Line Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02477644 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial Olaparib vs. Placebo Patients With Advanced FIGO Stage IIIB-IV High Grade Serious or Endometrioid Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer Treated Standard First-Line Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorArcagy ResearchRan2015 to 2022Enrolled806ConditionsOvarian CancerArmsOlaparib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Youwen ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-3591
Qiuping YangDepartment of Pathology, Tangshan Cancer Hospital, Tangshan, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5834-2331
Kun LiuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6720-3310
Hui CaoDepartment of Oncology, Chenzhou First People's Hospital, Chenzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6775-9287
Hong ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-8070
Central South University · CNChenzhou First People's Hospital · CNTangshan People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Clinical Research Project of Xiangya Hospital 2016L06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe PAOLA-1 trial (NCT02477644) reported final survival benefit associated with olaparib plus bevacizumab maintenance treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) based on molecular status. Our aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab for overall patients, patients with a breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) mutation, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or HRD without BRCA mutations AOC from the context of the American healthcare system.

methodsAnalysis of health outcomes in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in various molecular status-based AOC patient at a $150,000/QALY of willingness-to-pay was performed using a state-transitioned Markov model with a 20-year time horizon. Meanwhile, sensitivity analyses assessments were also used to gauge the model's stability.

resultsThe ICERs of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone were $487,428 ($374,758), $249,579 ($191,649), $258,859 ($198,739), and $270,736 ($206,640) per QALY (LY) in the overall patients, patients with BRCA mutations, patients with HRD, and patients with HRD without BRCA mutations AOC, respectively, which indicated that The ICERs was higher than $150,000/QALY in the US. Progression-free survival (PFS) value and olaparib cost emerged as the primary influencing factors of these findings in the sensitivity analysis.

conclusionAt current cost levels, olaparib plus bevacizumab treatment is not a cost-effective treatment for patients with AOC regardless of their molecular status in the US. However, this maintenance treatment may be more favorable health advantages for patients with BRAC mutations AOC.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesBevacizumabCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansBevacizumabolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesBevacizumabCost-Effectiveness AnalysisOlaparibOvarian NeoplasmsQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID37477106
PMCPMC10792217
OpenAlexW4383743885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.