Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477104›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2023

Epidemiologic characteristics and a prognostic nomogram for patients with vulvar cancer: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program in the United States, 1975 to 2016.

Shiyuan Wei, Lu Li, Tingting Yi, Licong Su, Qi Gao, Liangzhi Wu, Zhenbo OuYang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shiyuan Wei *Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-6558
Lu Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-4568
Tingting YiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5887-7196
Licong SuDivision of Nephrology, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3085-909X
Qi GaoDivision of Nephrology, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-9869
Liangzhi WuDepartment of Gynecology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4427-7453
Zhenbo OuYangDepartment of Gynecology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China. ouyangzhenbo@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9761-3756

Funding

2021 Science and Technology Plan Project of Haizhu District 2022-05Basic and Applied Basic Research Joint Project of City SL2023A03J00732Nanfang Hospital 2019C028Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1414040022Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515012517NSFC 82102994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo elucidate clinical characteristics and build a prognostic nomogram for patients with vulvar cancer.

methodsThe study population was drawn from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets. Cox proportional hazards model and competing risk model were used to identify the prognostic parameters of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was assessed by concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsA total of 20,716 patients were included in epidemiological analysis, of whom 7,025 patients were selected in survival analysis, including 4,215 and 2,810 in training and validation sets, respectively. The multivariate Cox model showed that the predictors for OS were age, marital status, histopathology, differentiation and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, whether to undergo surgery and chemotherapy. However, the predictors for CSS were age, race, differentiation and TNM stages, whether to undergo surgery and radiation. The C-index for OS and CSS in the training set were 0.76 and 0.80. The AUC in the training set for 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and CSS were 0.84, 0.81, 0.80 and 0.88, 0.85, 0.83, respectively, which was similar in the validation set. The calibration curves showed good agreement between prediction and actual observations. DCA revealed that the nomogram had a better discrimination than TNM stages.

conclusionsThe nomogram showed accurate prognostic prediction in OS and CSS for vulvar cancer, which could provide guidance to clinical practice.

Indexed as

NomogramsVulvar NeoplasmsArea Under CurveDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansPrognosisSEER ProgramUnited StatesCancer-Specific SurvivalNomogramOverall SurvivalReceiver Operating CharacteristicVulvar Cancer

Identifiers

PMID37477104
PMCPMC10627757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.