Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37477009›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2024

Minimum and Optimal CA19-9 Response After Two Months Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.

Leonard W F Seelen, Deesje Doppenberg, Thomas F Stoop, Anne Nagelhout, Lilly J H Brada, Koop Bosscha, Olivier R Busch, Geert A Cirkel, Marcel den Dulk, Freek Daams and 19 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Leonard W F SeelenDepartment of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Deesje DoppenbergAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas F StoopAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne NagelhoutDepartment of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lilly J H BradaDepartment of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Koop BosschaDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Olivier R BuschAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert A CirkelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marcel den DulkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Freek DaamsAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan van DierenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Casper H J van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan FestenDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nadia Haj MohammadDepartment of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Daan J LipsDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Maartje LosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Vincent E de MeijerDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gijs A PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Marco B PoléeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Martijn W J StommelDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke S WalmaDepartment of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roeland F de WildeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna W WilminkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLIsala · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLOLVG · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis nationwide multicenter study aimed to define clinically relevant thresholds of relative serum CA19-9 response after 2 months of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

backgroundCA19-9 is seen as leading biomarker for response evaluation in patients with LAPC, but early clinically useful cut-offs are lacking.

methodsAll consecutive patients with LAPC after 4 cycles (m)FOLFIRINOX or 2 cycles gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel induction chemotherapy (±radiotherapy) with CA19-9 ≥5 U/mL at baseline were analyzed (2015-2019). The association of CA19-9 response with median OS (mOS) was evaluated for different CA19-9 cut-off points. Minimum and optimal CA19-9 response were established via log-rank test. Predictors for OS were analyzed using COX regression analysis.

resultsOverall, 212 patients were included, of whom 42 (19.8%) underwent resection. Minimum CA19-9 response demonstrating a clinically significant median OS difference (12.7 vs. 19.6 months) was seen at ≥40% CA19-9 decrease. The optimal cutoff for CA19-9 response was ≥60% decrease (21.7 vs. 14.0 mo, P =0.021). Only for patients with elevated CA19-9 levels at baseline (n=184), CA19-9 decrease ≥60% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.98, P =0.042] was independently associated with prolonged OS, as were SBRT (HR=0.42, 95% CI, 0.25-0.70; P =0.001), and resection (HR=0.25, 95% CI, 0.14-0.46, P <0.001), and duration of chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% CI, 0.69-0.82, P <0.001).

conclusionsCA19-9 decrease of ≥60% following induction chemotherapy as optimal response cut-off in patients with LAPC is an independent predictor for OS when CA19-9 is increased at baseline. Furthermore, ≥40% is the minimum cut-off demonstrating survival benefit. These cut-offs may be used when discussing treatment strategies during early response evaluation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsPancreatic NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansInduction ChemotherapyCA-19-9 AntigenFluorouracilGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID37477009
OpenAlexW4384924752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.