ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2023
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Parent Perceptions of Physical Activity Scale (PPPAS) is a scale developed to measure the physical activity perceptions of parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders about their children. Turkish version of the PPPAS has yet to be established. The purpose of the present study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PPPAS.
methodsThe study included 130 parents with neurodevelopmental children. In the validity analyses of PPPAS, language validity, content validity analysis, and confirmatory and explanatory factor analysis were performed for construct validity. In the reliability analyses, Cronbach alpha analysis was used for internal consistency analysis, and intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was used for test retest.
resultsThe validity index was calculated as 0.94. Since the factor loading of the three questions in the survey remained below 40%,these questions were removed. Construct validity was achieved for two primary subscales of the PPPAS. It was found that the ICC valuesfor the reliability analysis of the PPPAS showed a perfect fit at the level of 0.918 for the benefits of the physical activity subdimension, and the physical activity barriers subdimension showed a perfect fit at the level of 0.916 (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: The Turkish PPPAS, which consists of two subscales, namely the benefits and barriers of physical activity, is valid and reliable. This tool can measure the physical activity perceptions of parents with preschool-age children with neurodevelopmental disorders in the Turkish population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.