Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476891›Full record

Observational studyTurkish journal of medical sciences2023

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of continuous renal replacement therapy performed on younger children weighing up to 10 kg.

Emrah Gün, Anar Gurbanov, Özlem Saritaş Nakip, Ahmet Yöntem, Ayşen Durak Aslan, Edin Botan, Fevzi Kahveci, Serhan Özcan, Ebru Azapağası, Serhat Emeksiz and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emrah GünDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Anar GurbanovDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Özlem Saritaş NakipDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet YöntemDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Ayşen Durak AslanDepartment of Pediatric, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Edin BotanDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Fevzi KahveciDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Serhan ÖzcanDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ebru AzapağasıDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Sami Ulus Gynecology Obstetrics and Child Health and Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Serhat EmeksizDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Mutlu Uysal YazıcıDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Sami Ulus Gynecology Obstetrics and Child Health and Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Selman KesiciDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Özden Özgür HorozDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Ömer ErdeveDepartment of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Benan BayrakçıDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Rıza Dinçer YıldızdaşDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Tanil KendirliDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TRHacettepe University · TRCukurova University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TRDr Sami Ulus Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the clinical features, modality, complications, and effecting factors on the survival of children weighing up to 10 kg who received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

methodsThis study was a retrospective observational study conducted in five pediatric intensive care units in tertiary hospitals in Turkey between January 2015 and December 2019.

resultsOne hundred and forty-one children who underwent CRRT were enrolled in the study. The median age was 6 (range, 2-12)months, and 74 (52.5%) were male. The median weight of the patients was 6 (range, 4-8.35) kg and 52 (36.9%) weighed less than 5 kg. The most common indication for CRRT was fluid overload in 75 (53.2%) patients, and sepsis together with multiorgan failure in 62 (44%). The overall mortality was 48.2%. DISCUSSION: Despite its complexity, CRRT in children weighing less than 10 kg is a beneficial, lifesaving extracorporeal treatment modality.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceChildFemaleHumansMaleRenal Replacement TherapyRetrospective StudieschildrenContinuous renal replacement therapypediatric intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID37476891
PMCPMC10388067
OpenAlexW4381622729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.