Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476860›Full record

ReviewLab on a chip2023

Vat photopolymerization 3D printed microfluidic devices for organ-on-a-chip applications.

Laura A Milton, Matthew S Viglione, Louis Jun Ye Ong, Gregory P Nordin, Yi-Chin Toh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab on a chip, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microengineered Gradient Hydrogels for Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Lithography-based 3D printing of hydrogels.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura A MiltonSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. yichin.toh@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8643-5686
Matthew S ViglioneDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA. nordin@byu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-0464
Louis Jun Ye OngSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. yichin.toh@qut.edu.au.
Gregory P NordinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA. nordin@byu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7241-5764
Yi-Chin TohSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. yichin.toh@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4105-4852

Funding

High Density 3D Printed Microfluidics With Open Source Resins for Biomedical ApplicationsR15GM123405 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI NORDIN, GREGORY P. · 2017 to 2023
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM123405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organs-on-a-chip, or OoCs, are microfluidic tissue culture devices with micro-scaled architectures that repeatedly achieve biomimicry of biological phenomena. They are well positioned to become the primary pre-clinical testing modality as they possess high translational value. Current methods of fabrication have facilitated the development of many custom OoCs that have generated promising results. However, the reliance on microfabrication and soft lithographic fabrication techniques has limited their prototyping turnover rate and scalability. Additive manufacturing, known commonly as 3D printing, shows promise to expedite this prototyping process, while also making fabrication easier and more reproducible. We briefly introduce common 3D printing modalities before identifying two sub-types of vat photopolymerization - stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) - as the most advantageous fabrication methods for the future of OoC development. We then outline the motivations for shifting to 3D printing, the requirements for 3D printed OoCs to be competitive with the current state of the art, and several considerations for achieving successful 3D printed OoC devices touching on design and fabrication techniques, including a survey of commercial and custom 3D printers and resins. In all, we aim to form a guide for the end-user to facilitate the in-house generation of 3D printed OoCs, along with the future translation of these important devices.

Indexed as

Microphysiological SystemsPrinting, Three-DimensionalLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrotechnologyStereolithography

Identifiers

PMID37476860
PMCPMC10448871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.