Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476856›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023

A Novel Free-hand Technique of Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Evaluation and Preliminary Clinical Results.

Weiqi Jiang, Ao Leng, Lingzhi Meng, Zuoyao Long, Yu Long, Qi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weiqi JiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-9797
Ao LengDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-8286
Lingzhi MengDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Zuoyao LongDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-6166
Yu LongDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2019-ZD-1034Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2022-YGJC-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePedicle screw implantation is the most common technique to achieve stability during spinal surgeries. Current methods for locating the entry point do not have a quantified criteria and highly rely on the surgeons' experience. Therefore, we aim to propose a quantified pedicle screw placement technique in the lumbar spine and to investigate its accuracy and safety in clinical practice.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study involving 110 patients who received spinal surgery in our hospital from August 2018 to August 2021. All patients included had herniation of a single lumbar disc and were consistently treated with posterior discectomy, inter-body fusion, and transpedicular internal fixation. For 54 patients in the observation group, the pedicle screws were placed with our technique, which is located at 4 mm below the superior edge of the transverse process in line with the lateral margin of the superior articular process. For 56 patients in the control group, pedicle screws were placed according to the traditional crista lambdoidalis method. Comparisons were made in terms of the operation time, blood loss, time for exposure, the accuracy of placement, and postoperative complications. Furthermore, we applied our method to 64 patients with indistinguishable crista lambdoidalis and evaluated the accuracy of screw placement and clinical outcomes according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score.

resultsThere was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding, accuracy of placement, and postoperative complications between our technique and the traditional crista lambdoidalis method (P > 0.05). However, the exposure time before screw placement (12.8 ± 0.3 vs. 17.4 ± 0.3, P = 0.001) and the total surgery time (97.2 ± 1.9 vs 102.3 ± 0.9, P = 0.020) were significantly shortened with our method. Additionally, in cases with indistinguishable crista lambdoidalis, our technique showed satisfying accuracy, with 97.6% screws placed in appropriate trajectory on the first attempt and all screws eventually positioned in the safe zone according to the Gertzbein-Robbins grading. All patients experienced steady improvement after surgery.

conclusionPlacing pedicle screws at 4 mm below the superior edge of the transverse process in line with the lateral margin of the superior articular process is a viable pedicle screw placement method. With this method, we observed a higher success rate and shorter operation time. In addition, this method can be applied in cases with indistinguishable crista lambdoidalis, and have satisfied success rate and clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesCrista lambdoidalis techniqueLumbar disc herniationLumbar fusionVertebral pedicle screws

Identifiers

PMID37476856
PMCPMC10475652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.