Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476828›Full record

ArticleChildren and youth services review2020

Long-term effects of early childhood programs through eighth grade: Do the effects fade out or grow?

Yu Bai, Helen F Ladd, Clara G Muschkin, Kenneth A Dodge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children and youth services review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Understanding Heterogeneity in the Impact of Public Preschool Programs.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu BaiDuke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, 201 Science Dr, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Helen F LaddDuke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, 201 Science Dr, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Clara G MuschkinDuke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, 201 Science Dr, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Kenneth A DodgeDuke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, 201 Science Dr, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Duke University · US

Funding

Factors in Persistence Versus Fadeout of Early Childhood Intervention ImpactsR01HD095930 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Jade Vanessa Marcus Jenkins · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Support for policies to improve early childhood educational development and reduce disparities grew rapidly this century but recently has wavered because of findings that program effects might fade out prematurely. Two programs implemented at scale in North Carolina (Smart Start and More at Four) have been associated with academic success early in elementary school, but it is not known whether these effects fade out or are sustained in middle school. Smart Start provides state funding to support high-quality early childcare in local communities, and More at Four provides state-funded slots for a year of credentialed pre-kindergarten. Funds were allocated for each program at varying rates across counties and years. We used this variation to estimate the long-term impact of each program through eighth grade, by measuring the association between state funding allocations to each program, in each of 100 counties over each of 13 consecutive years, and later student performance. Students were matched to funding levels provided to their home county in their early childhood years and then followed through eighth grade. Analyses using county- and year-fixed-effects regression models with individualand school-level covariates conducted on nearly 900,000 middle school students indicate significant positive impacts of funding for each program on reading and math test scores and reductions in special education placement and grade retention. These impacts do not fade out and seem instead to grow (for More at Four) as students progress through middle school. Students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds experience particularly large benefits from the More at Four Program.

Indexed as

Academic successEarly childhoodMiddle schoolMore at FourSmart Start

Identifiers

PMID37476828
PMCPMC10358055
OpenAlexW3008303684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.