Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476657›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2023

Assessing and comparing chest radiograph interpretation in the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of the Witwatersrand medical school, according to seniority.

R G Dreyer, C M van der Merwe, M A Nicolaou, G A Richards

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chest radiographic interpretation - an essential competency for Africa.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R G DreyerDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9118-3444
C M van der MerweWESP Radiology, George, South Africa.
M A NicolaouVan Rensburg and Partners and Honorary Lecturer, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
G A RichardsEmeritus Professor of Critical Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chest radiographs are a common diagnostic tool in the internal medicine department, and correct interpretation is imperative for adequate patient management. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of common pathologies in South Africa that are evident on chest radiographs, and to determine whether there are discrepancies according to different levels of qualification of doctors rotating through the internal medicine department, and which factors contribute to an accurate diagnosis. Methods: Fifteen chest radiographs with common pathologies were given to all doctors rotating through the Department of Internal Medicine at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, and they were asked to interpret them. Information pertaining to their experience, designation and confidence in chest radiograph interpretation was also obtained. Results: Diagnostic accuracy according to years of experience was as follows: 0 - 5 years 27.0%, 6 - 10 years 43.0%, and >10 years 47.9%. For different designations, accuracy was as follows: consultants 50.5%, registrars 40.9%, medical officers 36.4%, and interns 19.5%. Participants who were confident obtained a mean score of 39.4% and those who were not, a mean score of 31.6%. Conclusion: Chest radiographs are readily accessible and used daily in clinical practice in numerous facilities. An accurate diagnosis is important to provide quality healthcare. Improved training in interpretation for all, but especially for junior doctors, should be a priority in our training facilities. Study synopsis:

Indexed as

Chest X-raycompetencydiagnosiseducationmedicalradiographyradiologytraining

Identifiers

PMID37476657
PMCPMC10354876
OpenAlexW4364361487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.