ArticleIntelligence-based medicine2023
Novel integration of governmental data sources using machine learning to identify super-utilization among U.S. counties.
Article in Intelligence-based medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine-learning-based cost prediction models for inpatients with mental disorders in China.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Super-utilizers consume the greatest share of resource intensive healthcare (RIHC) and reducing their utilization remains a crucial challenge to healthcare systems in the United States (U.S.). The objective of this study was to predict RIHC among U.S. counties, using routinely collected data from the U.S. government, including information on consumer spending, offering an alternative method for identifying super-utilization among population units rather than individuals. Methods: Cross-sectional data from 5 governmental sources in 2017 were used in a machine learning pipeline, where target-prediction features were selected and used in 4 distinct algorithms. Outcome metrics of RIHC utilization came from the American Hospital Association and included yearly: (1) emergency rooms visit, (2) inpatient days, and (3) hospital expenditures. Target-prediction features included: 149 demographic characteristics from the U.S. Census Bureau, 151 adult and child health characteristics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 151 community characteristics from the American Community Survey, and 571 consumer expenditures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. SHAP analysis identified important target-prediction features for 3 RIHC outcome metrics. Results: 2475 counties with emergency rooms and 2491 counties with hospitals were included. The median yearly emergency room visits per capita was 0.450 [IQR:0.318, 0.618], the median inpatient days per capita was 0.368 [IQR: 0.176, 0.826], and the median hospital expenditures per capita was $2104 [IQR: $1299.93, 3362.97]. The coefficient of determination (R Conclusions: Integrating diverse population characteristics from numerous governmental sources, we predicted 3-outcome metrics of RIHC among U.S. counties with good performance, offering a novel and actionable tool for identifying super-utilizer segments in the population. Wider integration of routinely collected data can be used to develop alternative methods for predicting RIHC among population units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.